Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #209389

Re: Insidious systemd

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 29 May 2019 17:43:49 +0200
Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote:

> On 2019-05-28 22:16:27 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > On 2019-05-27, Patrick Bartek <patrick.bartek@gmail.com> wrote:  
> > > Hi, all!
> > >
> > > Needing to convert this box from wired ethernet to wireless, I searched
> > > for a suitable network manager and wicd looked good:  No desktop
> > > environment dependencies (I use a window manager Openbox and single
> > > lxpanel), compatibility with Openbox, etc.  Imagine my surprise when
> > > during the simulated install (I always check), I discovered systemd
> > > init was set to replace sysvinit.  I had converted Stretch to the
> > > latter during its install last year, but left the systemd libraries.
> > >
> > > There was no mention of this wicd caveat or any systemd dependency
> > > anywhere.  Obviously, there were.  What other things does systemd do
> > > that users are unaware and contrary to their wishes?  I wonder . . .
> > >
> > > After more investigating, I came across wifi-radar whose simulated
> > > install doesn't muck my system.  Any suggestions for something
> > > better?   I could just go with iwconfig or iw?  No big deal.  I've done
> > > it before.  But being lazy, if I can find an app to do the work, so
> > > much the better.
> > >
> > > Thanks for any input.
> > >
> > > B  
> > 
> > Are you trolling? You need to talk to the maintainers of wicd and ask
> > them why there is a systemd dependency.  
> 
> He shouldn't. I've a machine that is still under sysvinit, and
> I can install wicd without any dependency issue.
> 

What version OS you running? Fully up-to-date? GNOME? Or something else?

My install of Stretch was very atypical.  Started with a basic terminal
system using a netinstall CD, then added X, Openbox, apps, etc.  No
desktop environment was ever installed.  No login manager either.  Boots
to a terminal, log-in, then run startx.  It's a basic GUI set up.

B

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Insidious systemd Patrick Bartek <patrick.bartek@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 04:10 +0200
  Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-27 09:50 +0200
    Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 18:30 +0200
    Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2019-05-28 05:00 +0200
      Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-28 10:40 +0200
  Re: Insidious systemd Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2019-05-28 23:50 +0200
    Re: Insidious systemd Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-05-29 03:00 +0200
    Re: Insidious systemd Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2019-05-29 18:10 +0200
      Re: Insidious systemd Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-05-29 21:20 +0200
        Re: Insidious systemd Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2019-06-01 15:00 +0200
          Re: Insidious systemd Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-02 06:10 +0200
            Re: Insidious systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-06-02 07:30 +0200
              Re: Insidious systemd Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-03 08:00 +0200
      Re: Insidious systemd Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2019-05-29 21:30 +0200

csiph-web