Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #209547
| From | didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) |
| Date | 2019-06-03 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <y4Qcx-n7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <y2Nsu-51T-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <y3bl7-3wc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <y4rxv-1O5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <y4NRo-7fR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 03/06/2019 à 07:23, Patrick Bartek a écrit : [...] > The install includes lots of choices [...] So, why not > init? I think a Debian maintainer had answered in the past something like while not using systemd himself, he admitted the perceived percentage of Debian anti-systemd users was not so important to justify it, because one can relatively easily desinstall systemd and install sysv after install. It seems that you do not even need to install systemd (as the init system) at all during a fresh install (if you don't install a full blown DE)? https://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Installing_without_systemd [...] > I'm not against systemd, per se, just against having it forced on me > by way of dependencies. I don't think the init should ever be a > dependency. Of anything. [...] for a modern DE at least, systemd seems to be a requirement, but not as an init system? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd#Ancillary_components
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2019-05-28 18:50 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-05-29 20:20 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-06-02 07:50 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-03 07:40 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2019-06-03 10:10 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2019-06-03 10:40 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-04 06:40 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-06-03 13:10 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-04 06:30 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-06-18 19:20 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-06-03 15:00 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-06-03 15:30 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-06-03 15:50 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-06-03 16:40 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-06-03 17:00 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-06-18 19:20 +0200
csiph-web