Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #209542
| From | Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) |
| Date | 2019-06-03 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <y4NRo-7fR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <y2Nsu-51T-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <y3bl7-3wc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <y4rxv-1O5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 00:29:30 -0500 David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed 29 May 2019 at 11:01:58 (-0700), Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > Is Debian slowly becoming systemd proprietary? It would be a great > > loss to Linux and its philosophy if true. But that looks to be the > > direction Debian is headed. > > > > Once I suggested on this list when systemd first debuted with Jessie > > about choosing an init at install time as an option. It was not well > > received. Many said it couldn't be done or was impractical. My reply > > was, if you can change inits AFTER the install completes, why not > > BEFORE. > > I think it's beneficial to keep the d-i as simple as possible. > Once you've installed the system, all the tools are now available > for changing the init system to whichever one you choose. Adding > that to the d-i just bloats it (for everyone) without any > *essential* benefit to anyone. The install includes lots of choices like print server, server or desktop system, GUI, laptop utilities, etc. that are "bloat-worthy" and can be installed after the main install has completed. I know. I used to do it back in the day. I still do to a certain extent even today. But now those choices are an integral part of the install. So, why not init? Can't even spare a few hundred K? Ridiculous irrantionale. We're talking CD/DVDs not floppies. As far as what constitutes "essential": Shouldn't the user decide that? Or, at least, have a say so? What has happened to the basic philosophy of good business: Satisfy the customer? I'm not against systemd, per se, just against having it forced on me by way of dependencies. I don't think the init should ever be a dependency. Of anything. It's too basic to the system. > > The thread died of apathy shortly thereafter with no resolution. > > Perhaps because you didn't supply any patches for switching to > even one other init system (within the d-i, or as a post-installation > script). Didn't need scripts. Debian already had the ability to switch to sysvinit (probably because so many objected to systemd) by simply installing sysvinit-core. If it's that simple, why not make it part of the install. Yes, you won't be able to use GNOME, but freedom of choice comes with consequences as do all choices. B
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2019-05-28 18:50 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-05-29 20:20 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-06-02 07:50 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-03 07:40 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2019-06-03 10:10 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2019-06-03 10:40 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-04 06:40 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-06-03 13:10 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-04 06:30 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-06-18 19:20 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-06-03 15:00 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-06-03 15:30 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-06-03 15:50 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-06-03 16:40 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-06-03 17:00 +0200
Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-06-18 19:20 +0200
csiph-web