Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #209203
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) |
| Date | 2019-05-27 06:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <y2fKa-Rm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xTi4y-WM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <y1GMp-4Ij-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <y2doZ-7Wf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | none,nada,zip |
On Sunday 26 May 2019 10:09:49 pm Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 11:25:26AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Saturday 25 May 2019 07:33:01 am Andy Smith wrote: > > > My recollection was that none of that was ever established in any > > > of the threads you posted here, so that is a really weird thing to > > > keep stating. Did IPv6 use all your toilet paper and kick your dog > > > or something? > > > > You just pulled my trigger. > > > > No Andy, it didn't drink my last beer (Murphy does that), or kill > > any kittens but it did totally disable ipv4. How? Simply by refusing > > to apply a route/gateway to the ipv4 settings we do manually. > > Can you show the archive link to the email where it was established > that having IPv6 enabled in the kernel prevented your IPv4 > configuration from being applied? > > Otherwise that is a very strange thing to keep asserting. > > > And depending on the phase of the moon, those of us on host file > > networks are forced to edit the /e/n/i/config files and > > immediately chattr +i them in order to protect them from N-M's > > incessant meddling, ditto for resolv.conf, which we have to make > > into a real file, and chattr +i it for the same reason. For a > > while we could remove N-M on armhf-jessie but now its somehow > > linked to our choice of desktops so the only way is to rm it by > > hand, or chattr +i everything it touches. N-M at least has the > > common decency to not complain or go crazy when it finds itself > > locked out of its playpen. Unforch I can't say the same for hpfax, > > in the hplip package you get with cups. Its crashed this machine > > 6 or 7 times by killing hid-common, leaving the only working > > button the reset button on the machines front panel. Somebody put > > a call to hpfax in the root crontab, and when it gets called with > > nothing to do it goes postal killing all input devices on the usb > > bus by killing hid-common. A separate problem of course, one that > > hp needs to fix before buster goes live. > > Unclear how any of the above is or could ever be related to IPv6. > > > You folks with ipv6 all think we should all just switch and be done > > with it, > > Vast majority of Linux users already switched to having IPv6 > enabled, because it has been enabled by default for years, and IPv6 > addresses appear on every interface. > > If you are finding bugs then it would be good to report them instead > of howling at the moon. > > > You all claim that N-M won't bother an interface defined as static. > > Thats an outright blatant lie, > > I'm sure I may have said that somewhere although I don't think I've > said it to you. But also, it doesn't seem to have any relationship > to IPv6. > > Again, I suggest if you find bugs in NetworkManager that you report > them, not invoke the IPv6 bogey man until and unless you're certain > that it is that dread creature which plagues you. > > > Put a kill switch in that puppy. defaulted to off. And take a survey > > to see how many have turned it on a year from now. I'll be > > apologetic if its more than the 5% carrying their lappy to dunkin > > donuts. > > Could you apologise right now then since IPv6 has already been > enabled for decades and the vast majority of users experience no > problem? > I don't think so. ipv6 I'm sure is nice where its available. Where it is not available, its a pain in the ass because even if you set it up as a static ipv4, N-M will tear it down in 5 minutes or less. And N-M is a dependency because most have a dhcpd running, probably in the router by default. You are determined to exterminate any and all users of a hosts file, staticly defined network. Its ideal for small home networks. The SOB (N-M) ignores the word static in the stretch version, so I'm back to a decade ago when N-M was new. Doing my config file edits quickly, because when you save it, the next thing you'd better to is a root chattr +i to that file, then go on to nuking the /etc/resolv.conf link and make a real file that only has 2 lines, the first defining the nameservers address, the 2nd saying dnssearch hosts, nameserver. Save it and weld it down with a root chattr +i so N-M can't screw with it. And since stretch, if theres even a hint of a sniff of ipv6 being setup, the net tools will NOT assign a route/gateway to the ipv4 config. So your hosts file entries all work, but ping yahoo.com. network unreachable. /ipv6 rant. > > Rants aren't so bad, it's when they are utterly clueless and devoid > of factual content one could tend to come off looking like an > absolute lunatic. The facts have been stated. If you choose to not believe them, that is your problem. > Hopefully though you aren't a lunatic and can point me to this exact > situation where the enablement of IPv6 in your kernel caused > something to break, cos then we can get some bugs fixed instead of > just spilling more performance art onto the interwebs. I'd love to file bugs, but I only have one email address. And nominally 80 milliseconds after I enter it in an account form, "its already taken". So I can't file the bug without logging in, and I can't login because it heard of gheskett@shentel.net back in 2015 according o my records in FF. And the username I used then now contains an illegal character. I guess somebody changed the rules for usernames? It is for sure, one way to cut down on the bug reports isn't it? > Andy Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
forcedeth? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-02 13:30 +0200
Re: forcedeth? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2019-05-02 14:20 +0200
Re: forcedeth? Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2019-05-02 20:20 +0200
Re: forcedeth? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-02 22:30 +0200
Re: forcedeth? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2019-05-25 12:40 +0200
Re: forcedeth? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-25 13:00 +0200
Re: forcedeth? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-05-25 13:40 +0200
Re: forcedeth? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-25 17:30 +0200
That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-05-27 04:20 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-27 06:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-05-27 08:10 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-27 18:20 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 19:20 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-05-28 17:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-28 19:20 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-05-28 20:40 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-05-27 09:00 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-05-27 09:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-05-27 11:00 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-27 11:00 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 19:30 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 19:30 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-05-27 22:00 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-28 08:40 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-28 13:20 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-27 19:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-05-27 21:30 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-27 23:30 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-05-28 00:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 04:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2019-05-28 05:10 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-27 21:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 00:20 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2019-05-28 05:40 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-05-28 09:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-05-28 10:00 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-05-28 10:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-28 10:00 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2019-05-28 18:00 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-05-28 18:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 14:10 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-28 14:40 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 15:10 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-28 15:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 17:00 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-05-28 14:50 +0200
Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-27 19:20 +0200
IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-05-27 15:00 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-05-27 15:20 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-27 20:20 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-05-27 21:30 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-27 23:10 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-05-28 06:40 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-05-28 07:50 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 14:40 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-05-28 15:00 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 15:10 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-05-28 15:10 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-05-28 15:40 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 16:30 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-28 13:10 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-05-28 15:00 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-05-28 15:30 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 16:00 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-05-28 16:50 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 15:30 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-28 15:40 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 16:20 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-28 15:00 +0200
Re: IPV6 hosts file (was: Re: That time IPv6 farted in Gene's church (Was Re: forcedeth?)) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-05-28 03:00 +0200
Re: forcedeth? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-05-25 18:40 +0200
Re: forcedeth? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-25 19:10 +0200
csiph-web