Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #207702
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: is xdvi broken? |
| Date | 2019-04-20 03:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xOMZj-7bx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <xNWHn-HF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <xNXtL-1e7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xOJ5n-4Ut-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xOKkN-5zb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xOKXw-61p-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri 19 Apr 2019 at 18:10:14 (-0500), rlharris@oplink.net wrote: > On 2019.04.19 17:33, Étienne Mollier wrote: > ... > > It has this look and feel typical from monochrome X > > graphical interfaces released in the 80's. Tasty ! :) > > At least for diagnosing this problem, I would be interested in an > alternative to xdvi. There are many. I see a2ps, advi, apsfilter, atril, dvi2ps, evince and okular. Not all these are viewers: eg, dvips converts to a PostScript file for other viewers to use, and I think evince runs a converter itself automatically. But it's interesting to see that you're (still) using a DVI workflow: any particular reason for this? I suspect a majority are using one of the direct-to-PDF workflows, like pdflatex or lualatex. > > another desktop environment. LXDE may, or may not, be to your > > taste. It is as light in weight as Xfce. > > I think my machine is sufficiently fast that "lightweight" is not a > concern. I simply cannot find my way around the gnome desktop -- I > wish to see launchers for everything all the time, and not just when I > run the cursor over the correct portion of the screen. The gnome > approach must appeal to the video gamer; but I use the computer for > serious work. With Debian releases 7 and 8, I have been running xfce. I can't help you there, as a DE non-user. > > The program may become heavy on CPU due to necessary redraws > > each time a window covers it. > > In the workspace I have Emacs, two instances of xdvi, xfce-4-terminal, > and xfce-dictionary. I am working on a ten-page text-only document > with LaTeX markup. I did not experience this problem with Debian 8. How do you deliver this document? As a DVI, PS of PDF? Is it typical, or are your other documents more dependent on particular methods of, say, including graphics? But looking at just emacs, xdvi, and xterm running in separate windows, I can't see any difference in their behaviour from what I remember in the dim and distant past. The one unusual (for me) property of xdvi is that it rereads the input file whenever its window is exposed, without needing a ^R keystroke. I have no idea whether this might interact with certain sorts of window manager. > > Are you running your Xfce desktop with or without the compositor ? > > I found the menu; ENABLE DISPLAY COMPOSITING was checked. I was > unaware of the "tweaks" menu. That's the sort of thing I can't interpret (as a DE non-user), but it could be related to the previous paragraph. (That's just a guess.) Cheers, David.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-16 21:10 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-04-16 21:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-16 22:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2019-04-17 02:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-17 05:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2019-04-17 19:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-17 20:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-19 23:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> - 2019-04-20 00:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-20 01:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-20 03:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-20 05:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-20 10:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> - 2019-04-20 11:50 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-21 02:50 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-21 09:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-21 10:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 03:50 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-22 07:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Bill Wood <william.wood3@comcast.net> - 2019-04-22 09:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-22 10:10 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-04-22 10:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 21:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 05:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-20 15:00 +0200
csiph-web