Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #207701
| From | rlharris@oplink.net |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: is xdvi broken? |
| Date | 2019-04-20 01:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xOKXw-61p-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <xNJh8-11c-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xNWHn-HF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <xNXtL-1e7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xOJ5n-4Ut-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xOKkN-5zb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2019.04.19 17:33, Étienne Mollier wrote: ... > It has this look and feel typical from monochrome X > graphical interfaces released in the 80's. Tasty ! :) At least for diagnosing this problem, I would be interested in an alternative to xdvi. > another desktop environment. LXDE may, or may not, be to your > taste. It is as light in weight as Xfce. I think my machine is sufficiently fast that "lightweight" is not a concern. I simply cannot find my way around the gnome desktop -- I wish to see launchers for everything all the time, and not just when I run the cursor over the correct portion of the screen. The gnome approach must appeal to the video gamer; but I use the computer for serious work. With Debian releases 7 and 8, I have been running xfce. > The program may become heavy on CPU due to necessary redraws > each time a window covers it. In the workspace I have Emacs, two instances of xdvi, xfce-4-terminal, and xfce-dictionary. I am working on a ten-page text-only document with LaTeX markup. I did not experience this problem with Debian 8. > Are you running your Xfce desktop with or without the compositor ? I found the menu; ENABLE DISPLAY COMPOSITING was checked. I was unaware of the "tweaks" menu.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-16 21:10 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-04-16 21:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-16 22:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2019-04-17 02:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-17 05:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2019-04-17 19:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-17 20:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-19 23:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> - 2019-04-20 00:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-20 01:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-20 03:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-20 05:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-20 10:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> - 2019-04-20 11:50 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-21 02:50 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-21 09:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-21 10:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 03:50 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-22 07:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Bill Wood <william.wood3@comcast.net> - 2019-04-22 09:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-22 10:10 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-04-22 10:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 21:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 05:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-20 15:00 +0200
csiph-web