Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #207653
| From | Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: is xdvi broken? |
| Date | 2019-04-17 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xNWHn-HF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xNBCV-4I5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xNBWh-4Ph-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xNCSl-5oP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <xNGCC-7IU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xNJh8-11c-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
rlharris@oplink.net writes: > <snip> > > A month ago I was using latexmk with the same options on this machine. > I seem to recall an occasional jump back to the xdvi window, but not > the constant jumping back I was seeing today. So I think that the new > Cherry keyboard must be the culprit. You may be able to configure your window manager to disallow certain kinds of windows from stealing focus. KDE/Plasma has something called "Window Rules" that seems to fit the bill, but that I've never had occasion to try myself. Alternatively, if you have a large enough display, you can tile your windows so that emacs and xdvi are both visible at the same time. Not sure whether xdvi will steal focus away from emacs in that case. Won't help if your keyboard is actually sending unexpected input, of course. -- regards, kushal
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-16 21:10 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-04-16 21:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-16 22:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2019-04-17 02:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-17 05:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2019-04-17 19:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-17 20:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-19 23:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> - 2019-04-20 00:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-20 01:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-20 03:30 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-20 05:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-20 10:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> - 2019-04-20 11:50 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-21 02:50 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-21 09:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-21 10:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 03:50 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-22 07:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Bill Wood <william.wood3@comcast.net> - 2019-04-22 09:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-22 10:10 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-04-22 10:40 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 21:00 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 05:20 +0200
Re: is xdvi broken? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-20 15:00 +0200
csiph-web