Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10826
| From | Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 |
| Date | 2018-08-21 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wpawp-s7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <woNq9-3Oq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <woPLj-53M-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, po 20. 8. 2018 v 12:37 odesílatel Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> napsal: > If you do the later, then anyway, you'll have to do the former if you > need backports. This bite me a few times with OpenStack already. So, no > mater what the faith of the sphinx-build command, it's always best to > use python3 -m sphinx, IMO. > agree. So: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-pymysql/commit/b562fc29c311249fcb34639cc2a7d3267dd1f818 (only if python3-sphinx is in B-D) Any thoughts? -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: novy@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-20 10:10 +0200
Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-08-20 12:40 +0200
Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-21 10:50 +0200
Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 12:40 +0200
Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-21 13:00 +0200
Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 15:10 +0200
Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 22:30 +0200
csiph-web