Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10826

Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3
Date Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:50:01 +0200
Message-ID <wpawp-s7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <woNq9-3Oq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <woPLj-53M-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Aug 21 08:45:10 2018
Old-Return-Path <ondrej.novy@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, EMPTY_BODY=3, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MD5_SHA1_SUM=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-vk0-x236.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ondrej-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Uh9L30bB4GelGDRQ/1yHPdZqYgzKxKKRTpZuzxzUk+E=; b=imntyXsLFqwmx9i2xQo+edlorrNKzfJEDK9+pLfZPpSzaXLf0qOLjvqWZKiskQJIPU EfH9U3/Oq5L0zXLaY7RiJfWBX7fc6TG+1531YimLF94ZbFzw8D9b8GuGj2bt+XfAWwJ7 uqRts0+KNb6HwFhOWL8T8SyKqDgxELo9blcx1MY1BemtNqiIuwmLMhtUcKZqChBuBMHl CJ9XubivWuU577LWI7kwBvq6+8mbaak4dzAA9LFA3Nt/vXUzik/mYxkbJC65sbKur7Bz +1uZ1a1l986R5AABCL+pSEG+xBAGLyoFgse+oqn1Opm5VKI3wHVmXKDVXjhvDxvr2hmV uWhA==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Uh9L30bB4GelGDRQ/1yHPdZqYgzKxKKRTpZuzxzUk+E=; b=jYCODBVtjk6Ylg3ZaKH8xb27Bh1stmzAKTp0vJjNtqJKLFvN31qjEWu+vccrccfKzx Co8cAEqm/SBWkylR8QAfPgZf95L80ym6E7vSYZp5m/Wd8CFAQS8C3fsuXFJBY8dKhmtR KPiNdXqWQJ9Wbg0kuOW/hSBFacdB4Gx++ktwxnhWw8hq9lU4DA48oZcWLZcq1HOymz62 oLgdWMliwR5Ik/Odnzrh/UfgRM1XytasVIAzQ+k6EAa11kg8nWBeolChABk9VKvtRNdP PLFVzyQhc7MRX7SWEpJmB+pDoIEN+taU7KzdXO6tRPOH55xPuMqf8dBOcF1vOXMLA462 QSwg==
X-Gm-Message-State AOUpUlHlcWOmW73NFPXCS14AaCC6deap2Inbr0eUKBR+uJqtnz1u0Kkc QfrbWAzge2O/DF4v1XVgzv+hsJgtwu5BOltAkXFgiyC7
X-Google-SMTP-Source AA+uWPyX/lbGu21E1ZXUZo80k8oj9qjal/fUAF1lIvEDemrKwkIrnkm+UTe/O5Xlrnd3Fd25Dbk/84ave75bD56tD1A=
X-Received by 2002:a1f:1246:: with SMTP id 67-v6mr7629656vks.82.1534840015935; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 01:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000efdf9c0573edc9f1"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/16246
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAOO6c=zCf4R-1EaSF=XfmnEqKKinEJKF0FPHiMRsR6_s9H0n7w@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 57
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:26:44 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <CAOO6c=zCf4R-1EaSF=XfmnEqKKinEJKF0FPHiMRsR6_s9H0n7w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <CAOO6c=x1ct-idZy1S9WJM2wnT-FEeQewfEo8QAApCdX1+o4eXw@mail.gmail.com> <e0989250-c651-57cf-a0bf-d320e0cf1a7b@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10826

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

po 20. 8. 2018 v 12:37 odesílatel Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> napsal:

> If you do the later, then anyway, you'll have to do the former if you
> need backports. This bite me a few times with OpenStack already. So, no
> mater what the faith of the sphinx-build command, it's always best to
> use python3 -m sphinx, IMO.
>

agree. So:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-pymysql/commit/b562fc29c311249fcb34639cc2a7d3267dd1f818
(only if python3-sphinx is in B-D)

Any thoughts?

-- 
Best regards
 Ondřej Nový

Email: novy@ondrej.org
PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5  6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-20 10:10 +0200
  Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-08-20 12:40 +0200
    Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-21 10:50 +0200
      Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 12:40 +0200
        Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-21 13:00 +0200
  Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 15:10 +0200
    Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 22:30 +0200

csiph-web