Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10827

Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3

Show all headers | View raw

On 08/21/2018 10:26 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> po 20. 8. 2018 v 12:37 odesílatel Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org
> <mailto:zigo@debian.org>> napsal:
> 
>     If you do the later, then anyway, you'll have to do the former if you
>     need backports. This bite me a few times with OpenStack already. So, no
>     mater what the faith of the sphinx-build command, it's always best to
>     use python3 -m sphinx, IMO.
> 
> 
> agree. So:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-pymysql/commit/b562fc29c311249fcb34639cc2a7d3267dd1f818
> (only if python3-sphinx is in B-D)
> 
> Any thoughts?

On top of this, I generally also do PYTHON=python3, just in case the
Sphinx doc needs to invoke the interpreter...

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-20 10:10 +0200
  Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-08-20 12:40 +0200
    Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-21 10:50 +0200
      Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 12:40 +0200
        Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-21 13:00 +0200
  Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 15:10 +0200
    Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 22:30 +0200

csiph-web