Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671992
| Message-ID | <vt6BTSZ7jtPS2dw1NLmXf4MrR2Y@jntp> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not |
| References | (5 earlier) <18cacee7e7960b49$1991200$2300$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <ZP93U_kg5G59xX_I0ca6CrDkEEM@jntp> <18cad02cfb7ac649$2000103$260416$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <68iwBE2-zITVa2vsTyicPTQLhwY@jntp> <18cad2be359495ad$2000108$260416$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.math |
| Date | 2026-08-12 15:55 +0000 |
| Organization | Nemoweb |
| From | Python <python@cccp.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Le 11/08/2026 à 20:11, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : > On 8/11/2026 7:30 PM, Python wrote: >> Le 11/08/2026 à 19:24, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>> On 8/11/2026 7:04 PM, Python wrote: >>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 19:01, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>> On 8/11/2026 6:42 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 18:37, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>>>> On 8/11/2026 6:23 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 18:17, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2026 5:13 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 17:04, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2026 4:02 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 15:50, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2026 2:37 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 06:08, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2026 1:21 AM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If your proposal is a physical theory, it should begin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a precise definition, continue with equations, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end with predictions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, predictions. The duty of physical theories... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so, an observer is crossing Solar System with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the speed of c/2. He's going to measure a solar day >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1% of accuracy is enough). What is the prediction >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of The Shit of your idiot guru for the result? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any, poor piece of shit? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maciej, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming you mean the coordinate-time interval in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inertial frame of an observer moving at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> v = c/2, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the two Earth events defining the solar day are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> separated by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Delta t = 86400 s >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at the same place on Earth, special relativity gives >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Delta t' = gamma Delta t, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v²/c²) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> = 2/sqrt(3) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> = 1.1547... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Delta t' ~= 99766 s, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 27 h 43 min. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So yes, there is a perfectly definite prediction. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And unlike "common sense", it even comes with an equation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 6:48 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> One prediction is - 99766. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> From the postulates. >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > No. >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > No postulate of special relativity predicts that number. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> See, poor piece of shit - lying may look >>>>>>>>>>>>> like a good idea when you're cornered, but >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not. Lies have short legs. Particularly >>>>>>>>>>>>> when the one who lies is such a pathetic >>>>>>>>>>>>> idiot as you are. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, your idiot guru mumbled that comparing a >>>>>>>>>>>>> solar day to 1/86400 of itself is going to >>>>>>>>>>>>> give 99766. Qed. What a great idiot, wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> he? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maciej, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You are changing the question. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You asked for the prediction of special relativity for an >>>>>>>>>>>> observer moving >>>>>>>>>>>> at c/2. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sure. And you impudently lied that there is no. >>>>>>>>>>> Fortunately - even such a disgusting piece >>>>>>>>>>> of lying shit can't lie non stop, so now you >>>>>>>>>>> admit: one of the predictions I asked is >>>>>>>>>>> as I've told. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are still confusing a theory with one particular numerical >>>>>>>>>> example. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You're still a stinking piece of lying shit, >>>>>>>>> And the mumble of your idiot guru is still >>>>>>>>> not even consistent. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When I wrote >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "No postulate of special relativity predicts that number", >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I meant exactly what the sentence says. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The postulates do not predict the number 99766 by themselves. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They lead to the Lorentz transformations. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Applying those transformations to the particular case >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> v = c/2 >>>>>>>>>> Delta t = 86400 s >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> gives >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Delta t' = 99766 s. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That is no contradiction whatsoever. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is exactly like saying: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Pythagoras' theorem does not predict the number 5." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Indeed, it predicts >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> c = sqrt(a²+b²), >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and only for >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> a = 3, >>>>>>>>>> b = 4 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> does one obtain >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> c = 5. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Likewise, special relativity predicts >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Delta t' = gamma Delta t, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and only after substituting >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> v = c/2 >>>>>>>>>> Delta t = 86400 s >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> does one obtain >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 99766 s. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A general law is not the same thing as one particular numerical >>>>>>>>>> evaluation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That prediction follows directly from the Lorentz >>>>>>>>>>>> transformation. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now you are talking about "comparing a solar day to 1/86400 >>>>>>>>>>>> of itself". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, poor piece of shit, a measurement is >>>>>>>>>>> - to compare something to the unit, when your >>>>>>>>>>> idiot guru lived and mumbled the unit was >>>>>>>>>>> 1/86400 of a solar day. The idiot's prediction >>>>>>>>>>> was that comparing a day to itself is going >>>>>>>>>>> to give 99766/86400. What a great idiot he >>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are still confusing three different things. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1. the historical definition of the unit; >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2. the numerical value assigned to a time interval in one >>>>>>>>>> inertial frame; >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 3. the Lorentz transformation relating the coordinates of the >>>>>>>>>> same two >>>>>>>>>> events in another inertial frame. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The calculation starts from an interval already specified in >>>>>>>>>> the Earth's >>>>>>>>>> frame: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Delta t = 86400 s. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That is an input. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Special relativity then predicts the coordinate-time interval >>>>>>>>>> between >>>>>>>>>> the same two events in another inertial frame: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Delta t' = gamma Delta t. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> v = c/2, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> this gives approximately >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Delta t' = 99766 s. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nobody is "comparing a day to itself". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The same pair of events receives different coordinate-time >>>>>>>>>> intervals in >>>>>>>>>> different inertial frames. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That is exactly what Lorentz transformations describe. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> More importantly, your objection has nothing to do with >>>>>>>>>> relativity. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Suppose I express the same interval in hours instead of seconds. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Earth-frame interval is >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 24 h, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and the moving observer finds >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 27.71 h. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sure, sure, poor piece of shit: if your idiot >>>>>>>>> guru asserted that comparing a day to >>>>>>>>> 1/24 of a day must give 27.71 - it simply must >>>>>>>>> be true, no doubt. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maciej, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once again, you replace the statement by another one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Python, >>>>>>> yes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I never wrote >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>> "a solar day contains 99766 seconds". >>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wrote >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You wrote, that The Shit of your idiot guru >>>>>>> predicts that measuring a solar day (i.e. comparing >>>>>>> it to the unit) will give 99766. Right, that's >>>>>>> what the idiot mumbled, and the unit he meant was >>>>>>> 1/86400 of a solar day. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maciej, >>>>>> >>>>>> There is one point you consistently avoid. >>>>> >>>>> Because it's insignificant. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Special relativity is about assigning coordinates to the **same two >>>>>> spacetime events** in different inertial frames. >>>>>> >>>>>> The experiment is: >>>>>> >>>>>> E1 = solar noon on Earth, >>>>>> E2 = the next solar noon on Earth. >>>>>> >>>>>> Those are the only events involved. >>>>>> >>>>>> The question is simply: >>>>>> >>>>>> What coordinates do those same two events have >>>>>> in another inertial frame moving at c/2? >>>>> >>>>> No, poor piece of shit. The question is simply: >>>>> what will an observer moving with c/2 measure. >>>>> That you're too stupid to know what "measure" >>>>> means is not my problem. A shame, however, >>>>> that not knowing even that you dare opening >>>>> your fanatic, lying muzzle here. >>>> >>>> Maciej, >>>> >>>> No. >>>> >>>> I know perfectly well what "measure" means. >>> >>> Python, >>> >>> No. >>> >>> You don't. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> A measurement consists in assigning a numerical value to a physical >>>> quantity by comparison with a unit. >>>> >>>> That is exactly what is done here. >>>> >>>> The physical quantity being measured is the time interval between two >>>> events: >>>> >>>> E1 = solar noon on Earth, >>>> E2 = the next solar noon on Earth. >>> >>> Yes. And the unit that time interval was compared to was >>> 1/86400 of that time interval. Still your idiot guru >>> believed somehow that the result must be 99766. >>> >>> Well, the idiot denied Euclidean math later. Denying >>> that x/(x/86400) = 86400 could possibly be his >>> intension... But I assume it wasn't. >> >> Maciej, >> >> No. >> >> This is where your argument fails. >> >> You write: >> >> "the unit that time interval was compared to was >> 1/86400 of that time interval." >> >> No. >> >> That is simply false. >> >> Even historically, before the SI definition, the second was not defined >> as >> >> "1/86400 of the particular day being measured." >> >> It was defined from a standard (first the mean solar day > > What is the max abberation between > the mean solar day and a particular day, > poor piece of shit? Isn't it less than > 0.05%? > For the discussion like the one it is > completely insignificant. I didn't say otherwise. This is a diversion on your part. > You're just desperately trying to change > the subject, hoping that if you succeed - > bad facts will go away. Clearly you are. I'm not.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-07 19:50 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-08 19:03 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-09 07:08 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-09 15:00 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-09 06:19 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-09 22:05 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-09 16:19 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-09 21:55 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-09 22:40 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-10 19:09 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Cleaborn Moletotov <mllm@mrooo.ru> - 2026-08-09 14:24 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-08-10 15:41 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 16:36 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 15:43 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 17:05 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 13:08 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 23:21 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 17:43 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 17:54 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 20:46 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 06:08 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 12:37 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 15:50 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 14:02 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 17:04 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 15:13 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 18:17 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 16:23 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 18:37 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 16:42 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 19:01 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 17:04 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 19:24 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 17:30 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 17:43 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 20:13 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-12 15:56 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-12 18:15 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-12 16:34 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-12 19:48 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-12 17:57 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-12 20:27 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 11:33 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 14:46 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 13:03 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 15:28 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-13 07:39 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 13:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 16:27 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 14:48 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 17:30 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 15:39 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 18:23 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 16:30 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 18:59 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 23:57 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 08:13 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 08:40 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 12:51 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 10:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 13:13 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 11:32 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 13:50 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 11:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 14:18 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 12:31 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 14:37 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 12:42 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 15:02 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 13:09 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 18:36 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 16:42 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 19:14 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 17:27 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 19:38 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 17:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 20:17 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-15 20:33 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-15 21:41 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-15 21:33 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 06:55 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-16 10:24 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 12:32 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-16 10:43 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 13:03 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-16 11:08 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 16:32 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-16 22:57 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 23:10 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-16 15:34 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-16 22:29 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 22:47 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-16 23:35 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-16 15:40 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Hilder Bazulev <euele@bivzrb.ru> - 2026-08-16 21:45 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-08-17 17:55 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Sammie Niemczyk <anze@isa.pl> - 2026-08-17 19:12 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-17 07:52 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-16 22:52 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 14:40 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 18:19 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-14 16:33 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-15 10:51 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-15 11:18 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-15 14:11 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-15 12:22 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-15 17:59 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 09:16 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 09:29 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 08:56 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-16 08:34 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-16 10:04 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lowen Chukhnov <enuh@hlclk.ru> - 2026-08-16 21:54 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Shea Lupov <alell@eus.ru> - 2026-08-14 16:26 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-14 16:29 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-14 06:58 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-14 07:07 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-13 07:37 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 20:11 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-12 15:55 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-11 18:23 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-12 01:59 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Torre Kaczka <rz@oktreka.pl> - 2026-08-12 19:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-12 14:00 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Clayburn Ruzanov <nuc@braonala.ru> - 2026-08-12 21:29 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-11 21:11 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 22:15 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-12 21:11 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-12 21:14 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 19:21 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 17:51 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 20:12 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 18:17 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 20:27 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 23:34 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 23:19 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 06:03 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-11 20:04 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-08-11 10:53 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 12:14 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Peter Balagurov <pvaepgt@eaatp.ru> - 2026-08-11 14:41 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Elwood Bahtov <lehtb@oato.ru> - 2026-08-11 14:38 +0000
csiph-web