Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671983
| Message-ID | <68iwBE2-zITVa2vsTyicPTQLhwY@jntp> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not |
| References | (5 earlier) <18cacd994574b23b$1991198$2300$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <5cjkV31Mc3uo4lQMSqp71RzpF7g@jntp> <18cacee7e7960b49$1991200$2300$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <ZP93U_kg5G59xX_I0ca6CrDkEEM@jntp> <18cad02cfb7ac649$2000103$260416$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.math |
| Date | 2026-08-11 17:30 +0000 |
| Organization | Nemoweb |
| From | Python <python@cccp.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Le 11/08/2026 à 19:24, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : > On 8/11/2026 7:04 PM, Python wrote: >> Le 11/08/2026 à 19:01, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>> On 8/11/2026 6:42 PM, Python wrote: >>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 18:37, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>> On 8/11/2026 6:23 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 18:17, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>>>> On 8/11/2026 5:13 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 17:04, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2026 4:02 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 15:50, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2026 2:37 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11/08/2026 à 06:08, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2026 1:21 AM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If your proposal is a physical theory, it should begin with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a precise definition, continue with equations, and end with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> predictions. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, predictions. The duty of physical theories... >>>>>>>>>>>>> so, an observer is crossing Solar System with >>>>>>>>>>>>> the speed of c/2. He's going to measure a solar day >>>>>>>>>>>>> (1% of accuracy is enough). What is the prediction >>>>>>>>>>>>> of The Shit of your idiot guru for the result? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any, poor piece of shit? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maciej, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming you mean the coordinate-time interval in the >>>>>>>>>>>> inertial frame of an observer moving at >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> v = c/2, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the two Earth events defining the solar day are separated by >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Delta t = 86400 s >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> at the same place on Earth, special relativity gives >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Delta t' = gamma Delta t, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v²/c²) >>>>>>>>>>>> = 2/sqrt(3) >>>>>>>>>>>> = 1.1547... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Delta t' ~= 99766 s, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> which is about >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 27 h 43 min. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So yes, there is a perfectly definite prediction. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And unlike "common sense", it even comes with an equation. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 6:48 PM, Python wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> One prediction is - 99766. >>>>>>>>>>> >> From the postulates. >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > No. >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > No postulate of special relativity predicts that number. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> See, poor piece of shit - lying may look >>>>>>>>>>> like a good idea when you're cornered, but >>>>>>>>>>> it's not. Lies have short legs. Particularly >>>>>>>>>>> when the one who lies is such a pathetic >>>>>>>>>>> idiot as you are. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, your idiot guru mumbled that comparing a >>>>>>>>>>> solar day to 1/86400 of itself is going to >>>>>>>>>>> give 99766. Qed. What a great idiot, wasn't >>>>>>>>>>> he? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maciej, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are changing the question. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You asked for the prediction of special relativity for an >>>>>>>>>> observer moving >>>>>>>>>> at c/2. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sure. And you impudently lied that there is no. >>>>>>>>> Fortunately - even such a disgusting piece >>>>>>>>> of lying shit can't lie non stop, so now you >>>>>>>>> admit: one of the predictions I asked is >>>>>>>>> as I've told. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are still confusing a theory with one particular numerical >>>>>>>> example. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're still a stinking piece of lying shit, >>>>>>> And the mumble of your idiot guru is still >>>>>>> not even consistent. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I wrote >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "No postulate of special relativity predicts that number", >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I meant exactly what the sentence says. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The postulates do not predict the number 99766 by themselves. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They lead to the Lorentz transformations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Applying those transformations to the particular case >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> v = c/2 >>>>>>>> Delta t = 86400 s >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> gives >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Delta t' = 99766 s. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is no contradiction whatsoever. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is exactly like saying: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Pythagoras' theorem does not predict the number 5." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Indeed, it predicts >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> c = sqrt(a²+b²), >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and only for >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> a = 3, >>>>>>>> b = 4 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> does one obtain >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> c = 5. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Likewise, special relativity predicts >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Delta t' = gamma Delta t, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and only after substituting >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> v = c/2 >>>>>>>> Delta t = 86400 s >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> does one obtain >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 99766 s. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A general law is not the same thing as one particular numerical >>>>>>>> evaluation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That prediction follows directly from the Lorentz transformation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Now you are talking about "comparing a solar day to 1/86400 of >>>>>>>>>> itself". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sorry, poor piece of shit, a measurement is >>>>>>>>> - to compare something to the unit, when your >>>>>>>>> idiot guru lived and mumbled the unit was >>>>>>>>> 1/86400 of a solar day. The idiot's prediction >>>>>>>>> was that comparing a day to itself is going >>>>>>>>> to give 99766/86400. What a great idiot he >>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are still confusing three different things. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. the historical definition of the unit; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2. the numerical value assigned to a time interval in one >>>>>>>> inertial frame; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 3. the Lorentz transformation relating the coordinates of the >>>>>>>> same two >>>>>>>> events in another inertial frame. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The calculation starts from an interval already specified in the >>>>>>>> Earth's >>>>>>>> frame: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Delta t = 86400 s. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is an input. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Special relativity then predicts the coordinate-time interval >>>>>>>> between >>>>>>>> the same two events in another inertial frame: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Delta t' = gamma Delta t. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> v = c/2, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this gives approximately >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Delta t' = 99766 s. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nobody is "comparing a day to itself". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The same pair of events receives different coordinate-time >>>>>>>> intervals in >>>>>>>> different inertial frames. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is exactly what Lorentz transformations describe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More importantly, your objection has nothing to do with relativity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Suppose I express the same interval in hours instead of seconds. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Earth-frame interval is >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 24 h, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and the moving observer finds >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 27.71 h. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure, sure, poor piece of shit: if your idiot >>>>>>> guru asserted that comparing a day to >>>>>>> 1/24 of a day must give 27.71 - it simply must >>>>>>> be true, no doubt. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maciej, >>>>>> >>>>>> No. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once again, you replace the statement by another one. >>>>> >>>>> Python, >>>>> yes. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I never wrote >>>>>> >>>>>> ``` >>>>>> "a solar day contains 99766 seconds". >>>>>> ``` >>>>>> >>>>>> I wrote >>>>> >>>>> You wrote, that The Shit of your idiot guru >>>>> predicts that measuring a solar day (i.e. comparing >>>>> it to the unit) will give 99766. Right, that's >>>>> what the idiot mumbled, and the unit he meant was >>>>> 1/86400 of a solar day. >>>> >>>> Maciej, >>>> >>>> There is one point you consistently avoid. >>> >>> Because it's insignificant. >>> >>> >>>> Special relativity is about assigning coordinates to the **same two >>>> spacetime events** in different inertial frames. >>>> >>>> The experiment is: >>>> >>>> E1 = solar noon on Earth, >>>> E2 = the next solar noon on Earth. >>>> >>>> Those are the only events involved. >>>> >>>> The question is simply: >>>> >>>> What coordinates do those same two events have >>>> in another inertial frame moving at c/2? >>> >>> No, poor piece of shit. The question is simply: >>> what will an observer moving with c/2 measure. >>> That you're too stupid to know what "measure" >>> means is not my problem. A shame, however, >>> that not knowing even that you dare opening >>> your fanatic, lying muzzle here. >> >> Maciej, >> >> No. >> >> I know perfectly well what "measure" means. > > Python, > > No. > > You don't. > > >> >> A measurement consists in assigning a numerical value to a physical >> quantity by comparison with a unit. >> >> That is exactly what is done here. >> >> The physical quantity being measured is the time interval between two >> events: >> >> E1 = solar noon on Earth, >> E2 = the next solar noon on Earth. > > Yes. And the unit that time interval was compared to was > 1/86400 of that time interval. Still your idiot guru > believed somehow that the result must be 99766. > > Well, the idiot denied Euclidean math later. Denying > that x/(x/86400) = 86400 could possibly be his > intension... But I assume it wasn't. Maciej, No. This is where your argument fails. You write: "the unit that time interval was compared to was 1/86400 of that time interval." No. That is simply false. Even historically, before the SI definition, the second was not defined as "1/86400 of the particular day being measured." It was defined from a standard (first the mean solar day, later the ephemeris second, now the Cs-133 transition). The unit is independent of the particular interval being measured. Otherwise every measurement would be a tautology. It would be like defining the metre as "1/1000 of this particular stick" and then claiming that measuring the stick must always give exactly 1000 metres. That is not how metrology works. The standard is independent of the object being measured. Likewise, the interval between two solar noons is compared with an independent time standard. Special relativity then predicts how the coordinates of those same two events transform between inertial frames. You keep replacing the actual experiment by a different one in which the measuring unit is defined from the very interval being measured. That experiment is yours. It is not the one used in metrology, and it is not the one described by special relativity.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-07 19:50 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-08 19:03 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-09 07:08 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-09 15:00 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-09 06:19 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-09 22:05 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-09 16:19 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-09 21:55 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-09 22:40 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-10 19:09 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Cleaborn Moletotov <mllm@mrooo.ru> - 2026-08-09 14:24 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-08-10 15:41 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 16:36 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 15:43 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 17:05 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 13:08 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 23:21 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 17:43 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 17:54 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 20:46 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 06:08 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 12:37 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 15:50 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 14:02 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 17:04 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 15:13 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 18:17 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 16:23 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 18:37 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 16:42 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 19:01 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 17:04 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 19:24 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 17:30 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-11 17:43 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 20:13 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-12 15:56 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-12 18:15 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-12 16:34 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-12 19:48 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-12 17:57 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-12 20:27 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 11:33 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 14:46 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 13:03 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 15:28 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-13 07:39 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 13:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 16:27 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 14:48 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 17:30 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 15:39 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 18:23 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 16:30 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-13 18:59 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-13 23:57 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 08:13 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 08:40 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 12:51 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 10:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 13:13 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 11:32 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 13:50 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 11:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 14:18 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 12:31 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 14:37 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 12:42 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 15:02 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 13:09 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 18:36 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 16:42 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 19:14 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 17:27 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 19:38 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-14 17:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-14 20:17 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-15 20:33 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-15 21:41 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-15 21:33 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 06:55 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-16 10:24 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 12:32 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-16 10:43 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 13:03 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-16 11:08 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 16:32 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-16 22:57 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 23:10 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-16 15:34 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-16 22:29 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-16 22:47 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-16 23:35 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-16 15:40 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Hilder Bazulev <euele@bivzrb.ru> - 2026-08-16 21:45 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-08-17 17:55 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Sammie Niemczyk <anze@isa.pl> - 2026-08-17 19:12 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-17 07:52 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-16 22:52 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 14:40 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 18:19 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-14 16:33 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-15 10:51 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-15 11:18 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-15 14:11 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-15 12:22 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-15 17:59 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 09:16 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 09:29 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 08:56 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-16 08:34 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-16 10:04 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-18 09:02 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 11:26 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 14:35 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 12:46 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 15:06 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 15:25 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 13:29 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 15:37 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 13:51 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 15:57 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 14:09 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 16:15 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 14:27 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 16:43 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 14:50 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 16:56 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 15:03 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 17:11 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 15:22 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 17:26 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-18 15:34 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-18 17:37 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-18 07:52 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lowen Chukhnov <enuh@hlclk.ru> - 2026-08-16 21:54 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Shea Lupov <alell@eus.ru> - 2026-08-14 16:26 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-14 16:29 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-14 06:58 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-14 07:07 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-13 07:37 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 20:11 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-12 15:55 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-11 18:23 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-12 01:59 -0700
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Torre Kaczka <rz@oktreka.pl> - 2026-08-12 19:53 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-12 14:00 -0600
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Clayburn Ruzanov <nuc@braonala.ru> - 2026-08-12 21:29 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-11 21:11 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 22:15 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-12 21:11 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-12 21:14 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 19:21 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 17:51 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 20:12 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 18:17 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 20:27 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-10 23:34 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 23:19 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 06:03 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-08-11 20:04 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-08-11 10:53 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-11 12:14 +0200
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Peter Balagurov <pvaepgt@eaatp.ru> - 2026-08-11 14:41 +0000
Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not Elwood Bahtov <lehtb@oato.ru> - 2026-08-11 14:38 +0000
csiph-web