Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #688296
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? |
| Date | 2025-03-28 09:31 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vs64qb$2ocmg$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <vs4iug$186dc$1@dont-email.me> <1830f15ad744a064$76635$735129$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Fri, 3/28/2025 6:40 AM, Farley Flud wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:20:00 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>>
>> NTFS is certainly showing its age. But it’s not clear that ReFS is
>> really enough to take Windows forward.
>>
>
> Whatever the case, it will be another proprietary format that GNU/Linux
> cannot (easily) access.
>
> IIRC, it tooks many years befor GNU/Linux was able to correctly access
> and write NTFS files.
>
> I still would not trust the Linux kernel module for writing NTFS even
> though it is regarded to be stable and free from error.
>
> In the not-so-rare times that I must interchange files between Winblows
> and GNU/Linux I will use either VFAT or EXFAT format.
Paragon is offering a Linux driver for ReFS.
Even though the ReFS has no public spec for it.
I whipped up a quick test.
[Picture]
https://i.postimg.cc/bNfxLZpS/Re-FS-On-W11-Insider.gif
I don't think anything has changed.
Partition shrink is not offered (in Windows File Explorer).
Paul
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 18:26 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-27 22:26 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-27 20:25 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-28 20:00 +1100
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 06:14 -0700
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 21:23 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:18 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:17 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0500
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:21 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:13 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-03-28 10:40 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-28 09:31 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 00:57 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:38 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 11:46 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:20 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 23:42 +0000
csiph-web