Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #688400

Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?

From	Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?
Date	2025-03-29 23:42 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<slrnvuh1bf.6tk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> (permalink)
References	<vs4iug$186dc$1@dont-email.me> <1830f15ad744a064$76635$735129$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <slrnvuehc7.r9s.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vs7pvd$8b9k$1@dont-email.me> <vs9rnl$2ciql$8@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2025-03-29, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 00:38:21 -0400, Paul wrote:
>
>> There is more than one NTFS driver now. There is one in kernel and one
>> in FUSE. They're different. From different sources.
>
> I think the kernel one is still lacking in features compared to ntfs-3g, 
> which is the FUSE-based driver.
>
> Some people automatically assume that a kernel-based driver is going to 
> offer better performance than one that runs in user space. But I can’t see 
> big enterprise shops, moving heavily into Linux, continuing to run 
> mission-critical workloads on NTFS volumes, let’s face it.

The fuse filesystem is fast, it just uses up a bit more CPU to get that
speed.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-27 22:20 +0000
  Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 18:26 -0400
  Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-27 22:26 +0000
    Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-27 20:25 -0400
      Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-28 20:00 +1100
        Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ  <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 06:14 -0700
      Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 21:23 +0000
        Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0400
          Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
            Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:18 -0400
              Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:17 +0000
        Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0500
          Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
            Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:21 -0400
              Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:13 +0000
  Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-03-28 10:40 +0000
    Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-28 09:31 -0400
    Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 00:57 +0000
      Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:38 -0400
        Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 11:46 +0000
        Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:20 +0000
          Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 23:42 +0000

csiph-web