Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #688389
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? |
| Date | 2025-03-29 22:17 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vs9ril$2ciql$7@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <vs4q9s$1f4r1$1@dont-email.me> <vs73vk$3jepm$3@dont-email.me> <vs7pfe$80tl$1@dont-email.me> <vs84r9$mffn$3@dont-email.me> <vs86sh$omhc$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 03:18:39 -0400, Paul wrote: > Storage Spaces is a *Microsoft* technology. I'm not skilled > enough to give you a lesson in all the options. It is used > on servers. You might find one user in the Windows group > who uses it for home arrays/pools. I can remember it was in Windows Home Server 1.0, which was Microsoft’s failed attempt to compete with cheap NAS boxes running Linux. And then removed in 2.0, to the great unhappiness of the handful of users who wasted their money on the Microsoft product. > In WinXP era, it bought the Presidents Software defragmenter, put it in > WinXP. I thought a defragger was only introduced in Windows Vista. I remember because SSDs were just starting to become popular around then, and users discovered that Vista was shortening the life of their drives. Windows 7 fixed the defragger to ignore SSDs. The Linux folks fixed the problem just by designing their system to be more resistant to fragmentation in the first place.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 18:26 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-27 22:26 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-27 20:25 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-28 20:00 +1100
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 06:14 -0700
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 21:23 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:18 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:17 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0500
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:21 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:13 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-03-28 10:40 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-28 09:31 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 00:57 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:38 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 11:46 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:20 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 23:42 +0000
csiph-web