Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #193608
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! |
| Date | 2025-02-28 10:25 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vpsv3l$3pcit$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <vof5ol$1313$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <volebl$7c8$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <voqpqe$12r9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vp2o85$24hm$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vprp44$2cpq$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2025-02-27 23:37, Marion wrote: > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:49:27 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote : > > >> What's interesting isn't so much the classic garbage-bin battery in >> the new >> iPhone SE, nor the slow-as-molasses screen refresh but the expected >> price. > > As pitiful as the iPhone 16 batteries are in capacity, the iPhone 16 e fits > in the same anemic range as the rest of the iPhone 16 lineup. > *Comparing the iPhone 16e battery with the rest of the lineup* > <https://9to5mac.com/2025/02/27/iphone-16e-battery-comparison/> > > iPhone 16: 3561 mAh > iPhone 16 Plus: 4674 mAh > iPhone 16 Pro: 3582 mAh > iPhone 16 Pro Max: 4685 mAh > > Versus: > iPhone 16e: 3961 mAh > Absolute battery size is irrelevant. Run time on a charge is what matters to the user, and run time on a charge is what determines how many charge cycles in (say) a year the battery will experience. > Can you believe that the Apple herd animals wait all night outside the > Apple stores to buy this pallid garbage at an inflated expensive price. > > Given the EU won't allow Apple to sell any phone Apple can't certify lasts > 500 charge cycles without dropping below 80%, it's no wonder Apple can no > longer sell any iPhone older than the iPhone 15 in the EU later this year. > > By way of contrast, my free ($200 MSRP) Galaxy A32-5G has a 5Ah battery. Which is irrelevant if it uses more power in the ratio of 1.37 to 1 with an iPhone 16 1.07 to 1 with an iPhone 16 Plus 1.40 to 1 with an iPhone 16 Pro 1.07 to 1 with an iPhone 16 Pro Max And do you know you can look up which phones run the longest on a charge: <https://www.gsmarena.com/phones_best_battery_life_buyers_guide-review-2028.php> Guess which two phones they rank highest? :-)
Back to misc.phone.mobile.iphone | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-11 09:37 +0000
Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-02-11 09:17 -0800
Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-13 18:40 +0000
Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-02-13 11:20 -0800
Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-15 19:27 +0000
Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-02-15 16:00 -0800
Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-18 19:49 +0000
Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-28 07:37 +0000
Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-02-28 10:25 -0800
csiph-web