Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #193608

Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price!

From Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price!
Date 2025-02-28 10:25 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vpsv3l$3pcit$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <vof5ol$1313$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <volebl$7c8$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <voqpqe$12r9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vp2o85$24hm$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vprp44$2cpq$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 2025-02-27 23:37, Marion wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:49:27 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote :
> 
> 
>> What's interesting isn't so much the classic garbage-bin battery in 
>> the new
>> iPhone SE, nor the slow-as-molasses screen refresh but the expected 
>> price.
> 
> As pitiful as the iPhone 16 batteries are in capacity, the iPhone 16 e fits
> in the same anemic range as the rest of the iPhone 16 lineup.
> *Comparing the iPhone 16e battery with the rest of the lineup*
> <https://9to5mac.com/2025/02/27/iphone-16e-battery-comparison/>
> 
> iPhone 16: 3561 mAh
> iPhone 16 Plus: 4674 mAh
> iPhone 16 Pro: 3582 mAh
> iPhone 16 Pro Max: 4685 mAh
> 
> Versus:
> iPhone 16e: 3961 mAh
> 

Absolute battery size is irrelevant.

Run time on a charge is what matters to the user, and run time on a 
charge is what determines how many charge cycles in (say) a year the 
battery will experience.

> Can you believe that the Apple herd animals wait all night outside the
> Apple stores to buy this pallid garbage at an inflated expensive price.
> 
> Given the EU won't allow Apple to sell any phone Apple can't certify lasts
> 500 charge cycles without dropping below 80%, it's no wonder Apple can no
> longer sell any iPhone older than the iPhone 15 in the EU later this year.
> 
> By way of contrast, my free ($200 MSRP) Galaxy A32-5G has a 5Ah battery.


Which is irrelevant if it uses more power in the ratio of


1.37 to 1 with an iPhone 16

1.07 to 1 with an iPhone 16 Plus

1.40 to 1 with an iPhone 16 Pro

1.07 to 1 with an iPhone 16 Pro Max

And do you know you can look up which phones run the longest on a charge:

<https://www.gsmarena.com/phones_best_battery_life_buyers_guide-review-2028.php>

Guess which two phones they rank highest?

:-)

Back to misc.phone.mobile.iphone | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-11 09:37 +0000
  Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-02-11 09:17 -0800
  Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-13 18:40 +0000
    Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-02-13 11:20 -0800
    Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-15 19:27 +0000
      Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-02-15 16:00 -0800
      Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-18 19:49 +0000
        Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-28 07:37 +0000
          Re: The new iPhone SE is bottom of the barrel on every spec - except price! Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-02-28 10:25 -0800

csiph-web