Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #181333
| From | T <T@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: 0patch for W10 end-of-life |
| Date | 2025-01-13 21:53 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vm4u4f$24da4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <vm4fed$22spa$1@dont-email.me> <13jku6ntghaip$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
On 1/13/25 8:09 PM, VanguardLH wrote: > T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> https://www.pcmag.com/explainers/0patch-explained-how-it-works-and-what-it-means-for-the-end-of-windows > > https://0patch.com/ > > "$28 per year per device for its Pro service". To clarify this isn't > free. Also, only covers the most critical security patches, not all > vulnerabilities. The cost is trivial for a business scenario, but users > will probably decide to let the security patches slide until they get > their next prebuilt with whatever OS is preinstalled. > > https://0patch.com/pricing.html > > There is a free version, but that only works on a version of Windows > while it is still supported by Microsoft. Once Microsoft drops support > for a version, this free version ceases to function, and you have to > purchase it. > > Also, unlike patches from Microsoft that replace files (and why > sometimes a reboot is required to replace inuse system files), 0patch > does not alter any files. Instead if modifies the memory image of the > executable files. Everytime you boot, its agent has to let Windows > load, and then modify the memory image. > > "0patch does not replace executable files or modify them in any way. It > corrects them only in memory, which can be done without relaunching > them." > > Hmm, I thought Windows had protections against such in-memory > manipulation. If their "agent" doesn't load, you're back to a pre-patch > scenario. It needs to phone home to check if there are new > [micro]patches. Also, since their agent modifies the memory image of > executables, any backups you save will be on the files themselves, not > on the modified in-memory image of them. So, you won't be backing up a > micropatched version of the OS, just the OS pre-memory alteration. If > you restore the OS from backups, you'll need their agent to redeploy the > in-memory modifications. I don't know how they handle when you restore > to a prior state of the OS for which their later micropatches may not be > appropriate. > > Arcos Security is headquartered in Maribor, Slovenia, an EU and Nato > member. The contact page just lists e-mail addresses, but their company > profile page also lists a phone number, and address. From Google Maps' > street view on the address, I couldn't see where was Arcos Security > (Arco Varnost in Solvenian), but I couldn't see all the way around the > building, and they may be renting an office and don't post a sign on the > building. > > https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/acros-security > > Not much info there. They state 1 to 10 employees, but I've found that > count to be inaccurate. If there is some reason blocking yo from upgrading to W11, just get yourself a decent anti virus. Not McAfee or Norton. I also do not know if 0patch would qualify W10 as a supported OS under Payment Card Industry (PCI) guideline. And if you can or are just curious, download a Fedora Live USB and see if it is worth the transition. I recommend KDE, MATE, and Xfce, but NOT gnome as it is too weird. https://fedoraproject.org/spins
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
0patch for W10 end-of-life T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 17:42 -0800
Re: 0patch for W10 end-of-life VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-01-13 22:09 -0600
Re: 0patch for W10 end-of-life T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 21:53 -0800
Re: 0patch for W10 end-of-life VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-01-14 01:56 -0600
Re: 0patch for W10 end-of-life Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-14 06:48 -0500
Re: 0patch for W10 end-of-life VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-01-14 11:36 -0600
Re: 0patch for W10 end-of-life T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 09:36 -0800
Re: 0patch for W10 end-of-life ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 04:06 -0700
Re: 0patch for W10 end-of-life VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-01-14 12:08 -0600
csiph-web