Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10140

Re: PAPT Package Status

Show all headers | View raw

On February 11, 2018 6:15:43 PM UTC, Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote:
>While thinking about the migration of PAPT to git/salsa, I decided to
>take a 
>quick look at the size of the task.  Currently there are 199 packages
>in the 
>PAPT svn.  
>
>Of them, 27 have not been touched since jwilk did a mass commit for
>"Use 
>canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields" four years ago.  I suspect some of
>these are 
>good candidates for orphaning (need a real human uploader/maintainer in
>
>addition to the team) or rm.  If someone was interested in working on
>cleaning 
>things up, those might be a decent place to start.
>
>Of these, a stack aren't in Debian anymore (part of dd-list output):

Actually, that's not quite right.  They aren't in unstable anymore.

>E: Unknown package: trac-batchmodify
>E: Unknown package: harvestman
>E: Unknown package: zine
>E: Unknown package: mpdris
>E: Unknown package: pybackpack
>E: Unknown package: viridian
>E: Unknown package: google-sitemapgen
>E: Unknown package: emesene
>E: Unknown package: trac-git
>E: Unknown package: indywiki
>E: Unknown package: canto
>E: Unknown package: upnp-inspector
>
>dd-list of the remaining packages attached.  I did no checking to see
>if these 
>are in good shape or not (I recently uploaded a package that would have
>been 
>on this list except upstream woke up after 6 years and released a new
>version, 
>so just because it hasn't been touched, doesn't make it bad.
>
>Scott K

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

PAPT Package Status Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-02-11 19:20 +0100
  Re: PAPT Package Status Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-02-11 19:40 +0100

csiph-web