Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Scott Kitterman Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: PAPT Package Status Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 19:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Feb 11 18:32:19 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1518373924; bh=muOAFX2iV0VXN2u8QitdUVjCdfvwks9A2yAbeJVWGmk=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:From:From; b=1Ly8i3XoWzgJmQnYXA4JqDgWZFex9qkKYBL72PMgNlu6icA4oRbUugDz1gIUYC6IS U6UfW/vmE/8roeOb0oRPiv23DGI9/sGsFLz54PsmiZ3DWKQv76RpuBHdShDfgqSpWh 1bec7FajQPprjdwZSAQvbAap4TGRVaRUe6G/5VWE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15535 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/E365829D-2E96-426F-BC16-94AC9B9EB2C7@kitterman.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 46 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:32:01 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <1810798.TBSLNOvCPv@kitterma-e6430> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10140 On February 11, 2018 6:15:43 PM UTC, Scott Kitterman wrote: >While thinking about the migration of PAPT to git/salsa, I decided to >take a=20 >quick look at the size of the task=2E Currently there are 199 packages >in the=20 >PAPT svn=2E =20 > >Of them, 27 have not been touched since jwilk did a mass commit for >"Use=20 >canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields" four years ago=2E I suspect some of >these are=20 >good candidates for orphaning (need a real human uploader/maintainer in > >addition to the team) or rm=2E If someone was interested in working on >cleaning=20 >things up, those might be a decent place to start=2E > >Of these, a stack aren't in Debian anymore (part of dd-list output): Actually, that's not quite right=2E They aren't in unstable anymore=2E >E: Unknown package: trac-batchmodify >E: Unknown package: harvestman >E: Unknown package: zine >E: Unknown package: mpdris >E: Unknown package: pybackpack >E: Unknown package: viridian >E: Unknown package: google-sitemapgen >E: Unknown package: emesene >E: Unknown package: trac-git >E: Unknown package: indywiki >E: Unknown package: canto >E: Unknown package: upnp-inspector > >dd-list of the remaining packages attached=2E I did no checking to see >if these=20 >are in good shape or not (I recently uploaded a package that would have >been=20 >on this list except upstream woke up after 6 years and released a new >version,=20 >so just because it hasn't been touched, doesn't make it bad=2E > >Scott K