Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10139
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | PAPT Package Status |
| Date | 2018-02-11 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vi4oh-5OC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
While thinking about the migration of PAPT to git/salsa, I decided to take a quick look at the size of the task. Currently there are 199 packages in the PAPT svn. Of them, 27 have not been touched since jwilk did a mass commit for "Use canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields" four years ago. I suspect some of these are good candidates for orphaning (need a real human uploader/maintainer in addition to the team) or rm. If someone was interested in working on cleaning things up, those might be a decent place to start. Of these, a stack aren't in Debian anymore (part of dd-list output): E: Unknown package: trac-batchmodify E: Unknown package: harvestman E: Unknown package: zine E: Unknown package: mpdris E: Unknown package: pybackpack E: Unknown package: viridian E: Unknown package: google-sitemapgen E: Unknown package: emesene E: Unknown package: trac-git E: Unknown package: indywiki E: Unknown package: canto E: Unknown package: upnp-inspector dd-list of the remaining packages attached. I did no checking to see if these are in good shape or not (I recently uploaded a package that would have been on this list except upstream woke up after 6 years and released a new version, so just because it hasn't been touched, doesn't make it bad. Scott K
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PAPT Package Status Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-02-11 19:20 +0100 Re: PAPT Package Status Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-02-11 19:40 +0100
csiph-web