Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | ger.ct |
| Subject | Evidence based vs. eminence based |
| Date | 2024-09-19 18:59 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vchl8q$f1mh$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
Nur mal ein weiteres Beispiel, wie der "gesunde Menschenverstand" genauso wie der "Sachverstand" der gewichtigen Experten häufig in die Irre führt: Empfehlungen zur Verhütung der Erdnuss-Allergie: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/19/opinion/medicine-allergies-research.html "The Medical Establishment Closes Ranks, and Patients Feel the Effects Sept. 19, 2024 Carl Godfrey You probably know about the surge in childhood peanut allergies. Peanut allergies in American children more than tripled between 1997 and 2008, after doctors told pregnant and lactating women to avoid eating peanuts and parents to avoid feeding them to children under 3. This was based on guidance issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 2000. You probably also know that this guidance, following similar guidance in Britain, turned out to be entirely wrong and, in fact, avoiding peanuts caused many of those allergies in the first place. That should not have been surprising, because the advice violated a basic principle of immunology: Early exposure to foreign molecules builds resistance. In Israel, where babies are regularly fed peanuts, peanut allergies are rare. Moreover, at least one of the studies on which the British advice was based showed the opposite of what the guidance specified. As early as 1998, Gideon Lack, a British pediatric allergist and immunologist, challenged the guidelines, saying they were “not evidence-based.” But for years, many doctors dismissed Dr. Lack’s findings, even calling his studies that introduced peanut butter early to babies unethical. When I first reported on peanut allergies in 2006, doctors expressed a wide range of theories, at the same time that the “hygiene hypothesis,” which holds that overly sterile environments can trigger allergic responses, was gaining traction. Still, the guidance I got from my pediatrician when my second child was born that same year was firmly “no peanuts.” It wasn’t until 2008, when Lack and his colleagues published a study showing that babies who ate peanuts were less likely to have allergies, that the A.A.P. issued a report, acknowledging there was a “lack of evidence” for its advice regarding pregnant women. But it stopped short of telling parents to feed babies peanuts as a means of prevention. Finally, in 2017, following yet another definitive study by Lack, the A.A.P. fully reversed its early position, now telling parents to feed their children peanuts early. Pamela Paul is an Opinion columnist at The Times, writing about culture, politics, ideas and the way we live now." (Klar, hier in der NG haben es schon immer alle gewußt. Ich tatsächlich auch. Das Immunsystem muß trainiert werden, Sagrotan-Kinder schwächeln.)
Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-09-19 18:59 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-19 19:12 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-09-20 07:11 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-09-20 09:31 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-20 09:40 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-09-20 10:09 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-20 13:19 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-20 13:24 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2024-09-20 18:55 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-20 19:15 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 18:27 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-05 17:53 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-05 16:33 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Frank Nitzschner <nospam@nitzschner.de> - 2024-10-06 07:57 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Peter McD <peter.posts@gmx.net> - 2024-10-06 10:28 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 08:30 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 10:52 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-10-06 10:45 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 12:15 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 12:21 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-06 10:43 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 13:07 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-06 11:23 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 11:41 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Hartmut Ott <hottm@arcor.de> - 2024-10-06 14:45 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-10-06 17:52 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-10-06 11:22 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-06 10:38 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 13:06 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 13:03 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based michaelnoeusenet@mac.com (Michael Noe) - 2024-10-06 11:28 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-10-06 13:14 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 10:32 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 09:47 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-06 10:01 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 12:13 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-08 13:59 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-08 12:11 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Peter McD <peter.posts@gmx.net> - 2024-09-20 20:30 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-09-20 08:20 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-22 16:02 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2024-09-20 09:17 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Heiner Hass <usenet@hhass.de> - 2024-09-20 11:59 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-20 13:23 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 12:50 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-20 13:54 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 12:46 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2024-09-20 17:06 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-20 17:13 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-20 17:16 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2024-09-20 18:08 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 18:19 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-09-20 17:35 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 18:48 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2024-09-21 11:28 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-21 11:33 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-09-20 08:14 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 12:45 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2024-09-20 15:42 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2024-09-20 18:58 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 18:25 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-23 08:37 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2024-09-20 10:37 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-20 22:49 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-21 00:58 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-21 01:00 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2024-09-22 13:50 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lothar Kimmeringer <news201705@kimmeringer.de> - 2024-09-23 00:07 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-23 00:43 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-23 01:49 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lothar Kimmeringer <news201705@kimmeringer.de> - 2024-09-23 00:09 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2024-09-23 08:15 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-23 11:42 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Wuns Haerst <Wuns.Haerst@wurstfabrik.at> - 2024-09-27 17:23 +0200
csiph-web