Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | ger.ct |
| Subject | Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based |
| Date | 2024-09-20 09:31 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vcj8d4$dbmh$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <vchl8q$f1mh$1@solani.org> <ll34baF2lasU2@mid.individual.net> <5a7f715d5ee3780757c33f166d87a854@pi-dach.dorfdsl.de> |
Am 20.09.24 um 09:11 schrieb Ulf_Kutzner: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:12:10 +0000, [...] Bode wrote: > >> "[...] Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> writes: >> >>> It wasn’t until 2008, when Lack and his colleagues published a study >>> showing that babies who ate peanuts were less likely to have >>> allergies, that the A.A.P. issued a report, acknowledging there was a >>> “lack of evidence” for its advice regarding pregnant women. But it >>> stopped short of telling parents to feed babies peanuts as a means of >>> prevention. Finally, in 2017, following yet another definitive study >>> by Lack, the A.A.P. fully reversed its early position, now telling >>> parents to feed their children peanuts early. >>> >>> Pamela Paul is an Opinion columnist at The Times, writing about >>> culture, politics, ideas and the way we live now." >>> >>> >>> (Klar, hier in der NG haben es schon immer alle gewußt. Ich >>> tatsächlich auch. Das Immunsystem muß trainiert werden, >>> Sagrotan-Kinder schwächeln.) >> >> Na ja, als alleinige Erklärung finde ich das etwas dünn. Ich hatte einen >> Schulkameraden JG 64, der hatte eine ziemlich heftige >> Erdnussallergie. Da hätte die medizinische Eminez schon gute 30 Jahre >> früher von Erdnüssen abraten müssen. > > Und Kleinkinder bekommen m.W. > auch wegen der Aspirationsgefahr > selten Erdnüsse, jedenfalls > hierzulande, geschweige denn Babies. Korrekt. Deswegen ja nur Erdnussbutter, Peanut Butter, um das Immunsystem frühzeitig mit Nahrungsmitteln in Bekanntschaft zu bringen und eine Toleranz aufzubauen: "But for years, many doctors dismissed Dr. Lack’s findings, even calling his studies that introduced peanut butter early to babies unethical." Das stärkste Allergen aus dem Nahrungsmittelbereich sind übrigens Erdbeeren. -- Bitt um Vrzihung, di Tast " " klmmt manchmal...
Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-09-19 18:59 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-19 19:12 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-09-20 07:11 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-09-20 09:31 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-20 09:40 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-09-20 10:09 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-20 13:19 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-20 13:24 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2024-09-20 18:55 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-20 19:15 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 18:27 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-05 17:53 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-05 16:33 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Frank Nitzschner <nospam@nitzschner.de> - 2024-10-06 07:57 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Peter McD <peter.posts@gmx.net> - 2024-10-06 10:28 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 08:30 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 10:52 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-10-06 10:45 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 12:15 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 12:21 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-06 10:43 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 13:07 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-06 11:23 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 11:41 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Hartmut Ott <hottm@arcor.de> - 2024-10-06 14:45 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-10-06 17:52 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-10-06 11:22 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-06 10:38 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 13:06 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 13:03 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based michaelnoeusenet@mac.com (Michael Noe) - 2024-10-06 11:28 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-10-06 13:14 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 10:32 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2024-10-06 09:47 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-06 10:01 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-06 12:13 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-10-08 13:59 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-10-08 12:11 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Peter McD <peter.posts@gmx.net> - 2024-09-20 20:30 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-09-20 08:20 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-22 16:02 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2024-09-20 09:17 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Heiner Hass <usenet@hhass.de> - 2024-09-20 11:59 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-20 13:23 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 12:50 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-20 13:54 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 12:46 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2024-09-20 17:06 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-20 17:13 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2024-09-20 17:16 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2024-09-20 18:08 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 18:19 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-09-20 17:35 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 18:48 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2024-09-21 11:28 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-21 11:33 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Ulf_Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2024-09-20 08:14 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 12:45 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2024-09-20 15:42 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2024-09-20 18:58 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Goetz Schultz <ng.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2024-09-20 18:25 +0100
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-23 08:37 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2024-09-20 10:37 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-20 22:49 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-21 00:58 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-21 01:00 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2024-09-22 13:50 +0000
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lothar Kimmeringer <news201705@kimmeringer.de> - 2024-09-23 00:07 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2024-09-23 00:43 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-23 01:49 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Lothar Kimmeringer <news201705@kimmeringer.de> - 2024-09-23 00:09 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2024-09-23 08:15 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Dietz Proepper <dietz.usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2024-09-23 11:42 +0200
Re: Evidence based vs. eminence based Wuns Haerst <Wuns.Haerst@wurstfabrik.at> - 2024-09-27 17:23 +0200
csiph-web