Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #57871
| From | "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense |
| Date | 2018-11-25 17:56 +0000 |
| Organization | 255 software |
| Message-ID | <vLXbVarRJu+bFwje@255soft.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <cj9kvddl4kjgpnaes1ungigguq2k8gjp0o@4ax.com> |
In message <cj9kvddl4kjgpnaes1ungigguq2k8gjp0o@4ax.com>, micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> writes: >A tale calculated to keep you in suspense [] >**The street is shaped like a square, and google seems to have started >numbering at the SW corner and gone counterclockwise, when in fact the >numbers start at the NW corner and go clockwise. So 2 or 3 houses >somewhere in the middle are probably correct. Is it worth trying to >write Google for them to correct this, or is it better this way so my >enemies can't find me as quickly? All hail mighty google, just renumber all the houses so they match what Google says, you can't fight them (-: ... Seriously, it looks like you are moderately lucky - in most cases where things go to the wrong house, I think the error would be reciprocal (if no. 200 is getting no. 35's mail, then no. 35 should be getting no. 200's, so the two of you could get to know each other. And possibly but a prominent sign in the window saying "this is not number XX". I'm puzzled: do US houses not generally have a prominent number on the door/wall/gate/whatever, or, if they do, do US carriers not pay any attention to them? There's a round 5 or 6 inch diameter plaque on the front of mine with the number in it (some floral decoration around it which I wouldn't have chosen [it was there when I bought] but don't mind, but the number is clear and IMO unmissable). -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Have you ever heard about a petition, disagreed with it, but been frustrated that there's no way you can *show* that you disagree? If so, have a look at https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/232770 - and please pass it on if you agree, especially to twitter, facebook, gransnet/mumsnet, or any such forum. Why doesn't DOS ever say "EXCELLENT command or filename!"
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A tale calculated to keep you in suspense micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-24 23:59 -0500
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense Bob Henson <robert.h.henson@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 09:36 +0000
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-26 15:30 -0500
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-11-25 14:17 +0100
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense "NY" <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-25 14:18 +0000
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-25 11:03 -0500
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-25 14:59 -0500
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk> - 2018-11-25 20:43 +0000
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-26 19:37 -0500
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2018-11-25 16:11 +0000
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk> - 2018-11-25 17:56 +0000
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense 123456789 <12345@12345.com> - 2018-11-25 11:33 -0700
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 11:17 -0800
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense "NY" <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-25 20:17 +0000
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 14:41 -0800
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-26 20:37 -0500
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk> - 2018-11-27 05:25 +0000
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-26 20:33 -0500
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 20:11 -0800
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense "NY" <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-26 11:55 +0000
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-26 20:08 -0500
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-26 20:14 -0500
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk> - 2018-11-27 05:38 +0000
Re: A tale calculated to keep you in suspense Frank Markgraf <hauwech@nurfuerspam.de> - 2018-11-26 13:27 +0100
Phone only rings some of the time? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-26 15:28 -0500
Re: Phone only rings some of the time? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-11-27 00:18 +0100
Re: Phone only rings some of the time? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-27 03:21 -0500
Re: Phone only rings some of the time? "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk> - 2018-11-27 16:52 +0000
Re: Phone only rings some of the time? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-11-29 15:27 +0100
Re: Phone only rings some of the time? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-27 14:38 -0500
Re: Phone only rings some of the time? David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2018-11-27 21:12 +0000
Re: Phone only rings some of the time? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-28 09:49 -0500
Re: Phone only rings some of the time? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2018-11-28 10:15 -0500
Re: Phone only rings some of the time? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 10:52 -0500
csiph-web