Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #190971
| From | Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Why was this package removed but apt? |
| Date | 2018-01-12 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <v73vA-5R9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <v6mTD-1lb-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6LS2-23k-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6MXL-2KV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6MXL-2KV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6MXL-2KV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi again, A quick update: It seems like Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "false"; Is not "false" by default but indeed true in unattended-upgrades on Debian 9 (stretch) Am I wrong about that? / Jonathan On 01/11/18 16:27, Jonathan Sélea wrote: > Well, it was removed by unattended-upgrades according to term.log and > apt.log :) > > / Jonathan > > > On 01/11/2018 03:35 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> It was installed manually by me: >>> apt install php7.1-mbstring >>> So I "explicitly asked" apt to install that package actually. >> So now the question is why/how did this package end up marked >> "automatically installed" (or if it wasn't, why did unattended-upgrades >> remove it even tho it wasn't marked as automatically-installed; tho this >> would most likely be a bug in unattended-upgrades and I think such a bug >> is rather unlikely at this stage). >> >> >> Stefan > >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 11:30 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-01-10 11:40 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-10 11:50 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 12:10 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-10 12:20 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 12:40 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? MAS Jean-Louis <jean-louis.mas@imag.fr> - 2018-01-10 15:10 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 16:00 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-01-11 15:20 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-11 16:30 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-12 10:10 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-01-12 16:40 +0100
csiph-web