Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #190885
| From | Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Why was this package removed but apt? |
| Date | 2018-01-10 12:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <v6mTD-1lb-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <v6lNT-kd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6m7g-wz-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6mqC-108-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6mAi-19S-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
It was installed because CraftCMS depends on it :) According to term.log - unattended-upgrade performed the update 2018-01-06 06:41 and every package was updated (including php7.1-mbstring) Just two minutes after that, unattended-upgrade runs again and removes php7.1-mbstring and only that package. I can't find any activity on the server on that time (no users logged in and such). So something triggered unattended-upgrade to do this, hmm / Jonathan On 01/10/2018 12:18 PM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:01:50PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am running Debian Stretch but with sury.org repository. :) >> >> Jonathan Downland suggested that I checked what package is depending php7.1-mbstring on with: >> >> apt rdepends php7.1-mbstring >> >> php7.1-mbstring >> >> Reverse Depends: >> Depends: >> >> php7.1-mbstring-dbgsym (= 7.1.13-1+0~20180105151623.14+stretch~1.gbp1086fa) >> >> That particular package was not installed thou. > Then things depend (heh, pun :) on how the upgrade was made. If that package > doesn't depend on anything and it was automatically installed, it may well > be (depending on configuration, somewhere in /etc/apt) that it gets automatically > removed when not needed anymore. The question is... why was it installed in > the first place? > > Perhaps you find a hint somewhere in /var/log/apt/term.log > > Cheers > - -- tomás > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlpV9n4ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbP+QCeMVzcvSTgnUAlhZoMeX45t7oq > NPoAnA3XSZ4r/6N22EhneAaKZRdwjBvP > =IVds > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 11:30 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-01-10 11:40 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-10 11:50 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 12:10 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-10 12:20 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 12:40 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? MAS Jean-Louis <jean-louis.mas@imag.fr> - 2018-01-10 15:10 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 16:00 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-01-11 15:20 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-11 16:30 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-12 10:10 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-01-12 16:40 +0100
csiph-web