Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #190884
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Why was this package removed but apt? |
| Date | 2018-01-10 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <v6mAi-19S-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <v6lNT-kd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6m7g-wz-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6mqC-108-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:01:50PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote: > Hi > > I am running Debian Stretch but with sury.org repository. :) > > Jonathan Download suggested that I checked what package is depending php7.1-mbstring on with: > > apt rdepends php7.1-mbstring > > php7.1-mbstring > > Reverse Depends: > Depends: > > php7.1-mbstring-dbgsym (= 7.1.13-1+0~20180105151623.14+stretch~1.gbp1086fa) > > That particular package was not installed thou. Then things depend (heh, pun :) on how the upgrade was made. If that package doesn't depend on anything and it was automatically installed, it may well be (depending on configuration, somewhere in /etc/apt) that it gets automatically removed when not needed anymore. The question is... why was it installed in the first place? Perhaps you find a hint somewhere in /var/log/apt/term.log Cheers - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlpV9n4ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbP+QCeMVzcvSTgnUAlhZoMeX45t7oq NPoAnA3XSZ4r/6N22EhneAaKZRdwjBvP =IVds -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 11:30 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-01-10 11:40 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-10 11:50 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 12:10 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-10 12:20 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 12:40 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? MAS Jean-Louis <jean-louis.mas@imag.fr> - 2018-01-10 15:10 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 16:00 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-01-11 15:20 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-11 16:30 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-12 10:10 +0100
Re: Why was this package removed but apt? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-01-12 16:40 +0100
csiph-web