Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #190884

Re: Why was this package removed but apt?

From <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Why was this package removed but apt?
Date 2018-01-10 12:20 +0100
Message-ID <v6mAi-19S-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <v6lNT-kd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6m7g-wz-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <v6mqC-108-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:01:50PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I am running Debian Stretch but with sury.org repository. :)
> 
> Jonathan Download suggested that I checked what package is depending php7.1-mbstring  on with:
> 
> apt rdepends php7.1-mbstring
> 
> php7.1-mbstring
> 
> Reverse Depends:
>   Depends:
> 
> php7.1-mbstring-dbgsym (= 7.1.13-1+0~20180105151623.14+stretch~1.gbp1086fa)
> 
> That particular package was not installed thou.

Then things depend (heh, pun :) on how the upgrade was made. If that package
doesn't depend on anything and it was automatically installed, it may well
be (depending on configuration, somewhere in /etc/apt) that it gets automatically
removed when not needed anymore. The question is... why was it installed in
the first place?

Perhaps you find a hint somewhere in /var/log/apt/term.log

Cheers
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlpV9n4ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbP+QCeMVzcvSTgnUAlhZoMeX45t7oq
NPoAnA3XSZ4r/6N22EhneAaKZRdwjBvP
=IVds
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 11:30 +0100
  Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-01-10 11:40 +0100
  Re: Why was this package removed but apt? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-10 11:50 +0100
    Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 12:10 +0100
      Re: Why was this package removed but apt? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-10 12:20 +0100
        Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 12:40 +0100
          Re: Why was this package removed but apt? MAS Jean-Louis <jean-louis.mas@imag.fr> - 2018-01-10 15:10 +0100
            Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-10 16:00 +0100
          Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-01-11 15:20 +0100
            Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-11 16:30 +0100
              Re: Why was this package removed but apt? Jonathan Sélea <jonathan@selea.se> - 2018-01-12 10:10 +0100
                Re: Why was this package removed but apt? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-01-12 16:40 +0100

csiph-web