Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1738778
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers |
| Date | 2017-09-25 09:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utvGG-33T-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <urQ2S-5so-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <usoQW-2fe-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <usrc5-3JR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uszjk-8ri-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On (09/22/17 16:48), Luck, Tony wrote: [..] > Tested patch series on ia64 successfully. > > Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> thanks! > After this goes upstream, you should submit a patch to get rid of > all uses of %pF (70 instances in 35 files) and %pf (63 in 34) > > Perhaps break the patch by top-level directory (e.g. get all the %pF > and %pF in the 17 files under drivers/ in one patch). frankly, I was going to have some sort of a lazy deprecation process: didn't plan to send out a patch set that would hunt down all pf/pF-s. hm... speaking of upstream, any objections if this patch set will go through the printk tree, in one piece? I'll wait for several more days and then resend v3 with updated Documentation and tweaked checkpatch warning message. -ss
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:30 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 2/7] sections: split dereference_function_descriptor() Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:30 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 1/7] switch dereference_function_descriptor() to `unsigned long' Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 5/7] parisc64: Add .opd based function descriptor dereference Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 4/7] powerpc64: Add .opd based function descriptor dereference Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-09-20 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> - 2017-09-20 20:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-09-20 20:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 09:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 02:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-09-21 04:30 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 6/7] symbol lookup: use new kernel and module dereference functions Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 6/7] symbol lookup: use new kernel and module dereference functions Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 11:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> - 2017-09-20 22:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 02:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org> - 2017-09-22 07:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:10 +0200
RE: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2017-09-22 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:10 +0200
RE: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2017-09-25 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> - 2017-09-25 19:10 +0200
csiph-web