Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1735891 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-20 18:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-25 19:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:30 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 2/7] sections: split dereference_function_descriptor() Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:30 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 1/7] switch dereference_function_descriptor() to `unsigned long' Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 5/7] parisc64: Add .opd based function descriptor dereference Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 4/7] powerpc64: Add .opd based function descriptor dereference Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-09-20 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> - 2017-09-20 20:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-09-20 20:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 09:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 02:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-09-21 04:30 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 6/7] symbol lookup: use new kernel and module dereference functions Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 6/7] symbol lookup: use new kernel and module dereference functions Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 11:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> - 2017-09-20 22:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 02:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org> - 2017-09-22 07:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:10 +0200
RE: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2017-09-22 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:10 +0200
RE: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2017-09-25 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> - 2017-09-25 19:10 +0200
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 18:50 +0200 |
| Subject | RE: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers |
| Message-ID | <uszjk-8ri-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1737248 |
Tested patch series on ia64 successfully. Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> After this goes upstream, you should submit a patch to get rid of all uses of %pF (70 instances in 35 files) and %pf (63 in 34) Perhaps break the patch by top-level directory (e.g. get all the %pF and %pF in the 17 files under drivers/ in one patch). -Tony
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 09:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers |
| Message-ID | <utvGG-33T-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1737660 |
On (09/22/17 16:48), Luck, Tony wrote: [..] > Tested patch series on ia64 successfully. > > Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> thanks! > After this goes upstream, you should submit a patch to get rid of > all uses of %pF (70 instances in 35 files) and %pf (63 in 34) > > Perhaps break the patch by top-level directory (e.g. get all the %pF > and %pF in the 17 files under drivers/ in one patch). frankly, I was going to have some sort of a lazy deprecation process: didn't plan to send out a patch set that would hunt down all pf/pF-s. hm... speaking of upstream, any objections if this patch set will go through the printk tree, in one piece? I'll wait for several more days and then resend v3 with updated Documentation and tweaked checkpatch warning message. -ss
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 18:40 +0200 |
| Subject | RE: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers |
| Message-ID | <utEAj-q7-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1738778 |
> speaking of upstream, any objections if this patch set will go through > the printk tree, in one piece? Seems to be a better idea than trying to coordinate pulls from three separate "arch/" trees. Fine with me. -Tony
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 19:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers |
| Message-ID | <utF3k-So-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1739163 |
On 25.09.2017 18:29, Luck, Tony wrote: >> speaking of upstream, any objections if this patch set will go through >> the printk tree, in one piece? Fine with me too. Helge
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web