Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1719556
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning |
| Date | 2017-08-24 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ui7eG-2Ut-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ui6LF-2Jv-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <ui6LF-2Jv-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:15:57PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The code here prints an error if "p" is an error pointer but it still
> dereferences it at the end of the function when it does:
>
> intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)__pa_nodebug(p->data);
>
> We can just return early instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> v2: return early instead checking for IS_ERR_OR_NULL() at the end.
>
> We have to keep the final check whether "p" is NULL to handle the
> situation were we set "prev_found = true;" but then hit the continue
> statement instead of allocating "p".
I think we want to something more like this (not exit the loop if the
allocation fails). But I need to look at the again on a clear head:a
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 59edbe9d4ccb..0179f0fd8a79 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static bool microcode_matches(struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header,
return false;
}
-static struct ucode_patch *__alloc_microcode_buf(void *data, unsigned int size)
+static struct ucode_patch *memdup_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
{
struct ucode_patch *p;
@@ -183,11 +183,13 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
if (mc_hdr->rev <= mc_saved_hdr->rev)
continue;
- p = __alloc_microcode_buf(data, size);
- if (IS_ERR(p))
+ p = memdup_patch(data, size);
+ if (IS_ERR(p)) {
pr_err("Error allocating buffer %p\n", data);
- else
- list_replace(&iter->plist, &p->plist);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ list_replace(&iter->plist, &p->plist);
}
}
@@ -196,11 +198,12 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
* newly found.
*/
if (!prev_found) {
- p = __alloc_microcode_buf(data, size);
- if (IS_ERR(p))
+ p = memdup_patch(data, size);
+ if (IS_ERR(p)) {
pr_err("Error allocating buffer for %p\n", data);
- else
- list_add_tail(&p->plist, µcode_cache);
+ return;
+ }
+ list_add_tail(&p->plist, µcode_cache);
}
/*
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-24 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-24 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-24 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-24 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-24 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 11:20 +0200
[PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow walter harms <wharms@bfs.de> - 2017-08-25 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 13:50 +0200
[tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-29 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-25 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-24 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-08-24 23:10 +0200
csiph-web