Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1719539

[PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning

From Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning
Date 2017-08-24 22:20 +0200
Message-ID <ui6LF-2Jv-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ui6LF-2Jv-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


The code here prints an error if "p" is an error pointer but it still
dereferences it at the end of the function when it does:

	intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)__pa_nodebug(p->data);

We can just return early instead.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
v2: return early instead checking for IS_ERR_OR_NULL() at the end.

We have to keep the final check whether "p" is NULL to handle the
situation were we set "prev_found = true;" but then hit the continue
statement instead of allocating "p".

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 59edbe9d4ccb..aab900ddea6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -184,10 +184,11 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
 				continue;
 
 			p = __alloc_microcode_buf(data, size);
-			if (IS_ERR(p))
+			if (IS_ERR(p)) {
 				pr_err("Error allocating buffer %p\n", data);
-			else
-				list_replace(&iter->plist, &p->plist);
+				return;
+			}
+			list_replace(&iter->plist, &p->plist);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -197,10 +198,11 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
 	 */
 	if (!prev_found) {
 		p = __alloc_microcode_buf(data, size);
-		if (IS_ERR(p))
+		if (IS_ERR(p)) {
 			pr_err("Error allocating buffer for %p\n", data);
-		else
-			list_add_tail(&p->plist, &microcode_cache);
+			return;
+		}
+		list_add_tail(&p->plist, &microcode_cache);
 	}
 
 	/*

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-24 22:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-24 22:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-24 23:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-24 23:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-24 23:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 11:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 11:20 +0200
              [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 12:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving  flow walter harms <wharms@bfs.de> - 2017-08-25 12:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving  flow Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 13:50 +0200
                [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches  saving flow tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-29 11:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-25 11:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-24 23:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-08-24 23:10 +0200

csiph-web