Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1719539
| From | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning |
| Date | 2017-08-24 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ui6LF-2Jv-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ui6LF-2Jv-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
The code here prints an error if "p" is an error pointer but it still
dereferences it at the end of the function when it does:
intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)__pa_nodebug(p->data);
We can just return early instead.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
v2: return early instead checking for IS_ERR_OR_NULL() at the end.
We have to keep the final check whether "p" is NULL to handle the
situation were we set "prev_found = true;" but then hit the continue
statement instead of allocating "p".
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 59edbe9d4ccb..aab900ddea6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -184,10 +184,11 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
continue;
p = __alloc_microcode_buf(data, size);
- if (IS_ERR(p))
+ if (IS_ERR(p)) {
pr_err("Error allocating buffer %p\n", data);
- else
- list_replace(&iter->plist, &p->plist);
+ return;
+ }
+ list_replace(&iter->plist, &p->plist);
}
}
@@ -197,10 +198,11 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
*/
if (!prev_found) {
p = __alloc_microcode_buf(data, size);
- if (IS_ERR(p))
+ if (IS_ERR(p)) {
pr_err("Error allocating buffer for %p\n", data);
- else
- list_add_tail(&p->plist, µcode_cache);
+ return;
+ }
+ list_add_tail(&p->plist, µcode_cache);
}
/*
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-24 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-24 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-24 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-24 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-24 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 11:20 +0200
[PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow walter harms <wharms@bfs.de> - 2017-08-25 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-25 13:50 +0200
[tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-29 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-25 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-24 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode: Silence a static checker warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-08-24 23:10 +0200
csiph-web