Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617188
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... |
| Date | 2023-08-09 12:42 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ub0flf$k79$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <161c49af-6f11-4ee9-982f-2b53c07123f3n@googlegroups.com> <173121ea-f2e2-432c-8d6a-d7ad9a455059n@googlegroups.com> <f16b2741-2436-4fce-bc36-3ab614ce2f6en@googlegroups.com> |
On 8/9/2023 10:42 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > IT WAS AN HOAX! The only problem with that is that there have been many eclipses since then, and light deflection has been measured for them as well, and they confirm GR predictions. Cranks often believe that a breakthrough experiment is the end of the discussion as well. Therefore cranks believe if they can shoot down just the one single experiment, they "win". But the experiments are repeated frequently, often because a technology breakthrough allowed the breakthrough experiment in the first place, but in the future they're no big deal. These days, we don't even need an eclipse. Satellites with a sun-blocking shade (creating their personal eclipse) can detect deflection at any time. Also ultra-sensitive measurements that aren't even looking right at the sun (Hipparcos, GAIA etc.) work without any eclipse.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-05 12:19 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 13:28 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-05 13:34 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 07:42 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-09 12:42 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 09:52 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-09 13:09 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 13:48 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 08:51 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 07:36 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 07:52 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 11:24 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 09:45 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 18:51 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 16:02 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 20:32 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 21:52 -0700
Cretin Crank Richard Hertz foms at the mouth "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 08:28 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 19:40 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-11 21:45 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz takes it up the ass "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 08:56 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz takes it up the ass Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 09:34 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz takes it up the ass "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 10:05 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 23:31 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 15:26 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 15:56 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 16:06 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 16:19 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-10 11:37 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 03:42 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 07:31 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 13:25 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 07:07 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 21:02 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 19:12 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-07 12:26 -0500
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 10:29 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 14:19 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 14:40 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-07 18:48 -0500
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 17:08 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 19:36 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 14:41 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 14:48 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-08 13:47 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 05:12 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-08 07:25 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-08 11:03 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 08:58 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 10:06 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 03:20 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 13:24 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 13:30 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 04:38 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 04:35 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 14:34 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 06:14 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 19:08 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 11:37 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Ho Eidelman <eili@alaeialo.oe> - 2023-08-10 17:48 +0000
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 13:25 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 04:38 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-08-08 14:49 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 06:23 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-08 08:16 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-08 14:39 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 21:35 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 10:55 -0700
csiph-web