Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617169
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... |
| Date | 2023-08-09 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kjhbn2Ftqq1U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <1qf57og.11makpl1cytk6mN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <uatlg2$3eccp$2@dont-email.me> <1qf5xsn.1dq6ok8eklj06N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <70bb632e-95fa-4652-984c-2f81cb1d2974n@googlegroups.com> <1qf74v5.1trulmiuwcq89N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
On 2023-08-09 11:24:38 +0000, J. J. Lodder said: > Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 9 August 2023 at 10:06:51 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote: > [-] >>> Worse, against all available evidence. >>> That "1.75 arcseconds is wrong" has become a mantra to them. >> >> Sorry, trash, [snip more garbage] > > My dear trashy one, this is to inform you that you are going to far. > Calling people 'halfbrain' isn't nice, but it will pass. > (since we understand what kind of brain this is coming from) One could even take it as flattery, given that half a brain is a lot more than what Maciej has in his head. > > Having conversations and calling the other side 'trash' > just won't do. > > Jan -- athel cb : Biochemical Evolution, Garland Science, 2016
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-05 12:19 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 13:28 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-05 13:34 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 07:42 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-09 12:42 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 09:52 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-09 13:09 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 13:48 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 08:51 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 07:36 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 07:52 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 11:24 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 09:45 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 18:51 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 16:02 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 20:32 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 21:52 -0700
Cretin Crank Richard Hertz foms at the mouth "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 08:28 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 19:40 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-11 21:45 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz takes it up the ass "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 08:56 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz takes it up the ass Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 09:34 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz takes it up the ass "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 10:05 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 23:31 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 15:26 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 15:56 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 16:06 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 16:19 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-10 11:37 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 03:42 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 07:31 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 13:25 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 07:07 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 21:02 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 19:12 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-07 12:26 -0500
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 10:29 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 14:19 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 14:40 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-07 18:48 -0500
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 17:08 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 19:36 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 14:41 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 14:48 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-08 13:47 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 05:12 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-08 07:25 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-08 11:03 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 08:58 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 10:06 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 03:20 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 13:24 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 13:30 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 04:38 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 04:35 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 14:34 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 06:14 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 19:08 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 11:37 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Ho Eidelman <eili@alaeialo.oe> - 2023-08-10 17:48 +0000
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 13:25 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 04:38 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-08-08 14:49 +0200
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 06:23 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-08 08:16 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-08 14:39 -0400
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 21:35 -0700
Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 10:55 -0700
csiph-web