Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617197

Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds....

From	Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds....
Date	2023-08-09 19:12 +0200
Message-ID	<kjhvo3F2e0bU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<161c49af-6f11-4ee9-982f-2b53c07123f3n@googlegroups.com> <173121ea-f2e2-432c-8d6a-d7ad9a455059n@googlegroups.com> <f16b2741-2436-4fce-bc36-3ab614ce2f6en@googlegroups.com> <ub0flf$k79$1@dont-email.me> <1e63f7cc-8f58-4a26-a04c-2eca78167728n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2023-08-09 16:52:06 +0000, Richard Hertz said:

> On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 1:42:26 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
>> On 8/9/2023 10:42 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:>> > IT WAS AN HOAX!>> The 
>> only problem with that is that there have been many eclipses since> 
>> then, and light deflection has been measured for them as well, and 
>> they> confirm GR predictions.>> Cranks often believe that a 
>> breakthrough experiment is the end of the> discussion as well. 
>> Therefore cranks believe if they can shoot down just> the one single 
>> experiment, they "win". But the experiments are repeated> frequently, 
>> often because a technology breakthrough allowed the> breakthrough 
>> experiment in the first place, but in the future they're no> big 
>> deal.>> These days, we don't even need an eclipse. Satellites with a> 
>> sun-blocking shade (creating their personal eclipse) can detect> 
>> deflection at any time. Also ultra-sensitive measurements that aren't> 
>> even looking right at the sun (Hipparcos, GAIA etc.) work without any> 
>> eclipse.
> 
> HIPPARCOS PROVIDING DATA ABOUT STARLIGHT DEFLECTION? BULLSHIT, AS 
> ALWAYS, PROPAGATED BY
> RELATIVISTS, WHO ALWAYS TRY TO RE-WRITE HISTORY FAVORING EINSTEIN (A 
> JEW THING). READ THIS:

Putting garbage in all caps doesn't stop it from being garbage.  That 
something Dolan can teach his orange friend.
> 
> 
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/3h7sfJNDOeQ/m/SUkjAPt3AAAJ


-- 
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

Thread

It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-05 12:19 -0700
  Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 13:28 -0700
    Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-05 13:34 -0700
    Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 07:42 -0700
      Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-09 12:42 -0400
        Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 09:52 -0700
          Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-09 13:09 -0400
            Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 13:48 -0700
              Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 08:51 -0400
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 07:36 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 07:52 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 11:24 -0400
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 09:45 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 18:51 -0400
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 16:02 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 20:32 -0400
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 21:52 -0700
                Cretin Crank Richard Hertz foms at the mouth "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 08:28 -0700
              Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 19:40 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-11 21:45 -0700
                Crank Richard Hertz takes it up the ass "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 08:56 -0700
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz takes it up the ass Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 09:34 -0700
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz takes it up the ass "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 10:05 -0700
            Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 23:31 +0200
              Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 15:26 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 15:56 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 16:06 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 16:19 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-10 11:37 +0200
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 03:42 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 07:31 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 13:25 +0200
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 07:07 -0700
              Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 21:02 -0700
          Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 19:12 +0200
  Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-07 12:26 -0500
    Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 10:29 -0700
      Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 14:19 -0700
        Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 14:40 -0700
          Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-07 18:48 -0500
            Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 17:08 -0700
            Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 19:36 -0700
        Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 14:41 -0700
        Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 14:48 -0700
        Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-08 13:47 +0200
          Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 05:12 -0700
          Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-08 07:25 -0700
          Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-08 11:03 -0400
            Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 08:58 -0700
            Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 10:06 +0200
              Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 03:20 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 13:24 +0200
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 13:30 +0200
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 04:38 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 04:35 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-09 14:34 +0200
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 06:14 -0700
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 19:08 +0200
              Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 11:37 -0400
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Ho Eidelman <eili@alaeialo.oe> - 2023-08-10 17:48 +0000
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 13:25 +0200
                Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 04:38 -0700
      Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-08-08 14:49 +0200
        Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 06:23 -0700
        Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-08 08:16 -0700
          Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-08 14:39 -0400
            Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 21:35 -0700
    Re: It should now be easy to disprove 1.75 arc seconds.... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 10:55 -0700

csiph-web