Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5299
| From | Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository |
| Date | 2017-10-30 12:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uGgAa-4Xw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uEM1s-3cc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uFuFb-7Od-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uGef0-3Dz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Monday, 30 October 2017 8:57:00 AM AEDT Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > The one from 2016 is harder to exploit: I asked on #-apt back then and > > the sample exploit had a 1/4 success change with a 1.3 GB InRelease file > > on a memory starved i386 system). > > That hit rate is enough to build malware around... 25% hit rate is enough to be worth exploiting, but 1.3G of extra data greatly reduces the incidence. The small i386 systems tend not to have fast enough networking that 1.3G of data could be downloaded without notice. > Don't get me wrong, I agree that HTTPS is very overcomplicated and > terrible in a lot of ways. But the days of plain HTTP/TCP are over. > All connections need to be moving towards encryption. Even with HTTPS' > faults, we are better off using it than plain HTTP. I agree. There's little downside nowadays. Squid doesn't work particularly well caching APT repositories nowadays (strange timeouts and hangs during downloads) so the caching benefit of non-SSL has mostly gone away. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Marek Sebera <marek.sebera@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 10:50 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository 林博仁 <buo.ren.lin@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 10:50 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2017-10-26 20:30 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2017-10-27 12:50 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Morris Taylor <morris@eml.cc> - 2017-10-27 16:00 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz@debian.org> - 2017-10-27 16:30 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-10-28 05:00 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org> - 2017-10-28 10:30 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2017-10-30 10:10 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> - 2017-10-30 12:40 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2017-10-31 00:40 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Marek Sebera <marek.sebera@gmail.com> - 2017-11-09 11:00 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-11-09 11:20 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Marek Sebera <marek.sebera@gmail.com> - 2017-11-09 11:40 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-11-09 12:00 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-26 11:00 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Tototechy <angelmarckus@rediffmail.com> - 2020-01-16 17:00 +0100
csiph-web