Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5296
| From | Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository |
| Date | 2017-10-28 05:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uFpvP-4fM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uEM1s-3cc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uEM1s-3cc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uEV4K-l1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uFan8-2n7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > This idea that GPG signatures on the index files is enough has been > totally disproven. There was a bug in apt where Debian devices could be > exploited by feeding them crafted InRelease files: > > https://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3733 This was the *one* bug of this sort in the entire lifetime of apt thus far, AFAIK. > If HTTPS was used, that would mean exploiting that would require One of the dozens of zero-days already found in the TLS stack we had to run like crazy to patch ? In fact, the TLS stack is so complex, we can be reasonably sure there is still at least one remotely-exploitable zero-day there. Have you ever looked at the library stack in APT's http method, and compared it with the one in APT's https method? > HTTPS does not entirely solve all these problems, but it does > drastically improve things. That is *not* an opinion shared by everyone, to put it mildly. -- Henrique Holschuh
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Marek Sebera <marek.sebera@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 10:50 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository 林博仁 <buo.ren.lin@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 10:50 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2017-10-26 20:30 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2017-10-27 12:50 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Morris Taylor <morris@eml.cc> - 2017-10-27 16:00 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz@debian.org> - 2017-10-27 16:30 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-10-28 05:00 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org> - 2017-10-28 10:30 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2017-10-30 10:10 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> - 2017-10-30 12:40 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2017-10-31 00:40 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Marek Sebera <marek.sebera@gmail.com> - 2017-11-09 11:00 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-11-09 11:20 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Marek Sebera <marek.sebera@gmail.com> - 2017-11-09 11:40 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-11-09 12:00 +0100
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-26 11:00 +0200
Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Tototechy <angelmarckus@rediffmail.com> - 2020-01-16 17:00 +0100
csiph-web