Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5298

Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository

From Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository
Date 2017-10-30 10:10 +0100
Message-ID <uGef0-3Dz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <uEM1s-3cc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uEV4K-l1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uFan8-2n7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uFpvP-4fM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uFuFb-7Od-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization @||@

Show all headers | View raw



Ansgar Burchardt:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
>> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> This idea that GPG signatures on the index files is enough has been
>>> totally disproven.  There was a bug in apt where Debian devices could be
>>> exploited by feeding them crafted InRelease files:
>>>
>>> https://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3733
>>
>> This was the *one* bug of this sort in the entire lifetime of apt thus
>> far, AFAIK.
> 
> No, there was also
>    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-1051
> which I found.  That one was fairly easy to exploit (concatenate
> manipulated Release with wrong "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE" markers and
> correctly signed InRelease; gpg would verify the signature at the end,
> but apt would use the unsigned, manipulated Release from the beginning)
> 
> Similar bugs were present in several other places in Debian's
> infrastructure as well.
> 
> The one from 2016 is harder to exploit: I asked on #-apt back then and
> the sample exploit had a 1/4 success change with a 1.3 GB InRelease file
> on a memory starved i386 system).

That hit rate is enough to build malware around...


>>> If HTTPS was used, that would mean exploiting that would require
>>
>> One of the dozens of zero-days already found in the TLS stack we had to
>> run like crazy to patch ?
> 
> That is still valid of course, though I'm not sure if GnuPG or TLS
> libraries get wider testing...
> 
> Ansgar
> 

Don't get me wrong, I agree that HTTPS is very overcomplicated and
terrible in a lot of ways.  But the days of plain HTTP/TCP are over.
All connections need to be moving towards encryption.  Even with HTTPS'
faults, we are better off using it than plain HTTP.

.hc

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Marek Sebera <marek.sebera@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 10:50 +0200
  Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository 林博仁 <buo.ren.lin@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 10:50 +0200
    Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2017-10-26 20:30 +0200
      Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2017-10-27 12:50 +0200
        Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Morris Taylor <morris@eml.cc> - 2017-10-27 16:00 +0200
          Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz@debian.org> - 2017-10-27 16:30 +0200
        Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-10-28 05:00 +0200
          Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org> - 2017-10-28 10:30 +0200
            Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2017-10-30 10:10 +0100
              Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> - 2017-10-30 12:40 +0100
                Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2017-10-31 00:40 +0100
      Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Marek Sebera <marek.sebera@gmail.com> - 2017-11-09 11:00 +0100
        Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-11-09 11:20 +0100
          Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Marek Sebera <marek.sebera@gmail.com> - 2017-11-09 11:40 +0100
            Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-11-09 12:00 +0100
  Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-26 11:00 +0200
  Re: HTTPS enabled Debian Security repository Tototechy <angelmarckus@rediffmail.com> - 2020-01-16 17:00 +0100

csiph-web