Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #9597
| From | Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee |
| Date | 2017-10-31 17:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uGHTH-4t5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uFnaF-2Ir-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uFxD3-17K-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uFIyt-84V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uGBEC-Xq-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <uGHqF-4jD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
Russ> Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> writes:
>> Russ Allbery - 28.10.17, 16:13:
>>> There wasn't *anything* "left out" of that discussion.
>> In my opinion this is a pretty bold statement.
>> If everyone has been heard, noticed, felt and valued, if
>> everything has been covered, then why are we discussing it… yet
>> again now?
Russ> Those are not equivalent statements. In that sort of
Russ> discussion, it is literally impossible to make everyone feel
Russ> valued, since at least some people on each side will only feel
Russ> valued if their preferred option is chosen. That's therefore
Russ> not a reasonable thing to attempt to achieve; we can try to
Russ> maximize the number of people who feel valued, but there are
Russ> usually at least some people involved in this large and
Russ> sprawling of a decision for whom "valued" is synonymous with
Russ> "agreed with."
For myself, I've found that if I work with people I can often get to a
point where they feel valued even when there is disagreement.
As you point out that's not true for some people and it is difficult
even when it is possible.
I was not planning on discussing systemd again.
I am discussing how we handle conflict because I hope we can do a better
job of helping people feel valued even when we do not agree with their
technical positions.
In the limit, I hope to do your literally impossible:-)
Fortunately, I'd be thrilled and filled with joy to simply get closer to
that limit. Helping create a culture where we have mechanisms to help
ourselves separate value from agreement, and where we value using those
mechanisms would delight me.
I think even that is a hard ask, but I do not think it is literally
impossible.
--Sam
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2017-10-28 02:30 +0200
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2017-10-28 13:40 +0200
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2017-10-29 01:20 +0200
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2017-10-31 11:10 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2017-10-31 17:20 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2017-10-31 17:50 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Luk Claes <luk.claes@gmail.com> - 2017-10-31 18:20 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2017-10-31 18:40 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Marty <martyb@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-11-03 23:00 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2017-11-04 00:40 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Marty <martyb@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-11-07 02:20 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2017-11-07 04:00 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> - 2017-12-26 15:40 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2017-12-26 16:10 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-12-28 11:30 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2017-12-28 13:50 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2017-12-28 13:50 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-12-28 14:00 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2017-12-28 19:40 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-10-31 18:40 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2017-11-02 14:20 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-11-02 14:50 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-11-02 19:50 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2017-11-04 00:50 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2017-11-04 02:20 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-11-04 02:50 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-11-04 06:40 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> - 2017-11-05 17:10 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-11-04 05:20 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2017-11-03 14:10 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2017-10-29 05:30 +0100
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2017-10-29 00:00 +0200
Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2017-10-29 01:30 +0200
csiph-web