Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #16949
| From | micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword |
| Message-ID | <trbkqjtlf22jqd1ic21vq3dbi763b188cp@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <fp00qjd4su07cn9iaeb8sa38rca65967po@4ax.com> <vnq2bg$165sg$1@dont-email.me> <64j6qj5jr8qnboj7l9r2i9iqkva14tv78n@4ax.com> <vnvv3s$2ebll$1@dont-email.me> |
| Organization | Tweaknews |
| Date | 2025-02-10 12:02 -0500 |
In alt.comp.os.windows-11, on Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:12:47 -0500, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> wrote: >On 2/5/2025 6:33 AM, micky wrote: >> In alt.comp.os.windows-11, on Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:30:22 +0100, Herbert >> Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> wrote: >> >>> >>>> starting the program. The win10 task bar let you see each of multiple >>>> instances of the program, as with Chrome or Firefox, so you couuld click >>>> on the one you wanted. >>> >>> You can change this in the taskbar settings. But if the taskbar is full, >>> then this doesn't help. >> >> Why does MS mess things up that work well? >> > > Sometimes designs are well intentioned but just fail to >work well. For many people, managing the "badges" for >open windows on the taskbar is not something they do, >so ganging them up together, while impractical, looks less >cluttered. The worse thing to my mind is that ganging up, >without QuickLaunch, makes it hard to open a new instance. >I find that I have to have a shortcut on the Desktop for >things like FF because the FF shortcut on the taskbar >turns into a badge under the "pinning" model. > > So what's the point? It looks nice to people who don't >know how to use a computer anyway. MS have always been >very competent about making software. But there's also >greed, paranoia, and the need to support numerous usage >scenarios. > > Many changes have been based on a dual motive of keeping >up with fashion while looking for a new revenue stream. Those >incude Active Desktop, Passort, Hailstorm, SPOT watches, >Copilot, MSO 365, etc. > > Many other changes seem to be based more on paranoia >combined with cost saving strategies. They thwart customers >trying to use the product as they see fit. Any functionality >that hasn't been published as an official API is deliberately >broken on a regular basis. A good example of that is folder >view options. The whole mess has been needlessly broken >since Win98. In Win98, preferred folder window view didn't >take because Explorer didn't save the settings to the Registry >correctly. MS never fixed it! > In the following years and versions, every version of Windows >changes the arrangement of the notorious "Bags" Registry >keys that control the whole thing. So any tweaks to fix it in >one version must be rewritten for the next. Each change has >been frivolous but breaking. > > On Win10 I had to come up with obscure tweaks just to get >32px icons. Small is now 16 or so and medium is 48. No more >32! My tweak works, but only so long as I don't change the view >in a given folder. So every once in awhile I have to run a script >to delete all folder view memory from the Registry and reset >the 32px view. > > The ribbon menu? I expect that was well intentioned and >based on some kind of research and focus groups. The fact >that it doesn't work well (and what's with the random File >menu to nowhere??) is simply misjudgement. Probably they >wanted to show that they're improving things, so they figured >it was time to change it up. The Share menu reminds me of >those silly Internet and Email buttons on "Internet keyboards". >It's about fashion, not functionality. None of it even works >unless you configure the options, which no one is going to do. >Sort of like the jet engine shaped tail lights on cars in the 50s. >They didn't turn cars into jets, but, hey, cool or what? :) Hey, my '50 Olds had an air intake under the headlights just like the WWII Lockheed P-38 -- but I couldn't find any close-up pictures. )
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-02-02 19:07 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-02 19:58 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-02-04 09:31 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-02 20:02 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-02-03 10:35 +0000
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-03 08:37 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-02-04 11:21 +0000
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-02-04 09:29 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-04 10:11 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-02-04 15:20 +0000
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-02-04 09:28 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-04 09:57 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2025-02-03 10:30 +0100
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2025-02-03 11:57 +0100
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2025-02-03 12:25 +0100
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> - 2025-02-03 13:03 +0000
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2025-02-03 14:55 +0100
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-02-03 13:56 +0000
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2025-02-03 17:14 +0100
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-02-03 13:19 +0000
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-02-05 06:33 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-05 10:12 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-02-10 12:02 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-10 13:23 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 14:38 -0700
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-02-06 13:19 +0000
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-02-10 11:35 -0500
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-02-10 19:16 +0000
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 15:13 -0700
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-02-11 11:02 +0000
Re: WIN1 1One-line taskbar; Starting wndwos without pasword Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-10 17:14 -0500
csiph-web