Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #59548
| From | Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| References | <f25a1682-aaa8-4b25-add2-74950eed8731@googlegroups.com> <oflvjs$ium$1@dont-email.me> <20170519015039.52f223c7@_> |
| Message-ID | <toqdnWZfX5KYd4PEnZ2dnUU7-LGdnZ2d@supernews.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2017-05-19 07:50 -0500 |
Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2017 08:28:39 +0300 > Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 19/05/2017 8:22, gavino himself wrote: > >> > how would they communicate? >> >> By quantum-entanglement > > I'm sure you meant that as a joke, but it's a valid future solution. It's not. There's an explanation of the no-communication theorem, with a supporting formal argument, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-communication_theorem. Andrew.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 22:22 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:28 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-19 01:50 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:54 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ilya Tarasov <ilya74.tarasov@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 02:38 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 12:47 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-05-19 07:50 -0500
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-20 04:31 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-05-20 04:02 -0500
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-19 01:50 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:39 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-05-19 19:16 +0100
csiph-web