Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #59577
| From | Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? |
| Date | 2017-05-20 04:31 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <20170520043117.49999238@_> (permalink) |
| References | <f25a1682-aaa8-4b25-add2-74950eed8731@googlegroups.com> <oflvjs$ium$1@dont-email.me> <20170519015039.52f223c7@_> <toqdnWZfX5KYd4PEnZ2dnUU7-LGdnZ2d@supernews.com> |
On Fri, 19 May 2017 07:50:13 -0500 Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote: > Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> wrote: > > On Fri, 19 May 2017 08:28:39 +0300 > > Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 19/05/2017 8:22, gavino himself wrote: > >> > how would they communicate? > >> > >> By quantum-entanglement > > > > I'm sure you meant that as a joke, but it's a valid future > > solution. > > It's not. There's an explanation of the no-communication theorem, > with a supporting formal argument, at > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-communication_theorem. > Then, what are these articles going on about? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/05/scientists-have-achieved-quantum-communication-for-the-first-time http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2017/may/18/particle-free-quantum-communication-is-achieved-in-the-lab http://www.sciencealert.com/a-new-quantum-teleportation-distance-record-has-been-set http://www.sciencealert.com/quantum-teleportation-was-just-achieved-over-7-km-of-cable And, just how could you have quantum computing without communication? In order to quantum compute, quantum information must be stored and retrieved from quantum memory using quantum communication. Yes? Rod Pemberton -- "Well, many people are really f---ing stupid too. Should we just adopt all their standards?" - George Carlin
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 22:22 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:28 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-19 01:50 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:54 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ilya Tarasov <ilya74.tarasov@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 02:38 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 12:47 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-05-19 07:50 -0500
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-20 04:31 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-05-20 04:02 -0500
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-19 01:50 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:39 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-05-19 19:16 +0100
csiph-web