Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #59536
| From | Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? |
| Date | 2017-05-19 08:54 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ofm14f$n13$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <f25a1682-aaa8-4b25-add2-74950eed8731@googlegroups.com> <oflvjs$ium$1@dont-email.me> <20170519015039.52f223c7@_> |
On 19/05/2017 8:50, Rod Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2017 08:28:39 +0300 > Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 19/05/2017 8:22, gavino himself wrote: > >>> how would they communicate? >> >> By quantum-entanglement > > I'm sure you meant that as a joke, but it's a valid future solution. I was being facetious, yes. I don't know whether or not it will become a valid solution in the future, there is a lot to be worked out there first. Before we solve communications via QE, I would like to understand why Govno keeps posting? I think a PhD in psychological disorders awaits the one who can crack that puzzle.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 22:22 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:28 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-19 01:50 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:54 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ilya Tarasov <ilya74.tarasov@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 02:38 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 12:47 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-05-19 07:50 -0500
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-20 04:31 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-05-20 04:02 -0500
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-19 01:50 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:39 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-05-19 19:16 +0100
csiph-web