Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1594464
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_is_contended() track status of OSQ |
| Date | 2017-03-07 18:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tirpf-2s0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tipQt-1uF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:03:48AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> It was found that the current rwsem_is_contended() function did not
> look at the status of the OSQ and hence would miss waiters on OSQ. So
> that function is now modified to look at the OSQ as well.
Ideally I'd kill the entire function.
if (need_resched() ||
rwsem_is_contended(&fs_info->commit_root_sem)) {
if (wakeup)
caching_ctl->progress = last;
btrfs_release_path(path);
up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
cond_resched();
mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
down_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
goto next;
}
is the only user of it in the entire tree and it makes no bloody sense
what so ever. rwsem is a preemptible lock after all.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_is_contended() track status of OSQ Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-03-07 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_is_contended() track status of OSQ Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-07 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_is_contended() track status of OSQ Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-03-07 22:00 +0100
csiph-web