Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1590272
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver |
| Date | 2017-03-01 12:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgaVz-2rn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <tdWN4-731-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdWN4-731-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg71D-894-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg8qK-Tq-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg9Zw-1Pu-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Loh, Tien Hock <tien.hock.loh@intel.com> wrote:
> On Rab, 2017-03-01 at 10:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Loh, Tien Hock <tien.hock.loh@intel.c
>> Another option would be to fold the timestamp into the revision
>> attribute,
>> but whether that is a reasonable place for it would in turn depend on
>> what the timestamp signifies.
>>
>> Can you explain what the timestamp is used for? Does it identify the
>> time that the hardware revision was made, the time that a software
>> was built which was loaded into it, or something else?
>> What kind of user space application would need this information?
>
> I just checked, and it seems like we can't put this into soc subsystem.
> In FPGA, we now can do partial reconfiguration, which "reconfigures"
> the hardware to have an updated sysid and timestamp value, and the base
> address of the Intel System ID may also be changed. This would require
> the driver to be a module that will be removed, probed again. The soc
> subsystem doesn't seem to be a suitable place to add this driver.
Ah, I had not realized this is for fpga_manager.
Why not put the attributes into /sys/class/fpga_manager/*/ then
along with the other attributes that exist there? That way, we have
an interface that works for all users of drivers/fpga/
> A note on the timestamp, in the old days this is used to check that the
> BSP is using the correct FPGA hardware. I believe in Linux we should do
> the same in the driver, and if it not, the driver should print a
> warning. The timestamp's print is not exactly needed. I'll add the
> feature into the driver in the next patch.
Ok.
Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-02-15 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-02-15 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver "Loh, Tien Hock" <tien.hock.loh@intel.com> - 2017-02-23 07:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver "Loh, Tien Hock" <tien.hock.loh@intel.com> - 2017-02-23 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver "Loh, Tien Hock" <tien.hock.loh@intel.com> - 2017-03-01 08:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-01 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver "Loh, Tien Hock" <tien.hock.loh@intel.com> - 2017-03-01 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-01 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver "Loh, Tien Hock" <tien.hock.loh@intel.com> - 2017-03-02 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-02-23 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/misc: Add Intel System ID driver "Loh, Tien Hock" <tien.hock.loh@intel.com> - 2017-02-23 07:00 +0100
csiph-web