Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1588313

Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups

From Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups
Date 2017-02-26 12:40 +0100
Message-ID <tf5lf-68s-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <tbGW5-6FB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbH5M-6Yf-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbHS9-7lr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbIbw-7H1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <teuOJ-5to-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:53:19PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:38:04PM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> >> > Do you want me to continue to use Acked-by, or should I switch to
> >> > Reviewed-by?
> >>
> >> These tags do have different meanings, and have come up at Kernel Summit the
> >> last couple of years. My interpretation of those discussions is:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: I have no objection to this patch, but I didn't really give it a
> >> thorough review. I trust your judgement. e.g. minor change to your driver to
> >> support a subsystem API change. These are of very little value.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: I have carefully reviewed this patch and would like it to be
> >> applied. This should usually come with some sort of commentary describing the
> >> level of review or an area you focused on. This is what we would like to see
> >> from all of our driver maintainers. These are high value.
> >>
> >> Linus *really* dislikes one line acked by's, and only *slightly* more so than
> >> one line reviewed by's. :-)
> >
> > Got it, thanks, this is very helpful.
> >
> > In light of this I give you the following.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>
> 
> Thanks, applied for testing with above tag.

Andy,

It looks like you missed this part of Jonathan's message:

> As per subsequent discussion we have agreed to drop patch 8/10 from the
> series: it creates problems on newer hardware and the issue it is addressing
> will be more completely dealt with in a subsequent patch series.

I see that patch 8/10 was applied to testing as well.  Could you please
drop that single patch?

Thanks,

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Kępień

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-02-17 04:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net> - 2017-02-17 04:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-02-17 05:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net> - 2017-02-17 05:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-02-17 06:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-24 21:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> - 2017-02-26 12:40 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-26 16:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> - 2017-02-17 08:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-02-24 23:20 +0100

csiph-web