Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1588313
| From | Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups |
| Date | 2017-02-26 12:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tf5lf-68s-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <tbGW5-6FB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbH5M-6Yf-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbHS9-7lr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbIbw-7H1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <teuOJ-5to-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:53:19PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:38:04PM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > >> > Do you want me to continue to use Acked-by, or should I switch to > >> > Reviewed-by? > >> > >> These tags do have different meanings, and have come up at Kernel Summit the > >> last couple of years. My interpretation of those discussions is: > >> > >> Acked-by: I have no objection to this patch, but I didn't really give it a > >> thorough review. I trust your judgement. e.g. minor change to your driver to > >> support a subsystem API change. These are of very little value. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: I have carefully reviewed this patch and would like it to be > >> applied. This should usually come with some sort of commentary describing the > >> level of review or an area you focused on. This is what we would like to see > >> from all of our driver maintainers. These are high value. > >> > >> Linus *really* dislikes one line acked by's, and only *slightly* more so than > >> one line reviewed by's. :-) > > > > Got it, thanks, this is very helpful. > > > > In light of this I give you the following. > > > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net> > > Thanks, applied for testing with above tag. Andy, It looks like you missed this part of Jonathan's message: > As per subsequent discussion we have agreed to drop patch 8/10 from the > series: it creates problems on newer hardware and the issue it is addressing > will be more completely dealt with in a subsequent patch series. I see that patch 8/10 was applied to testing as well. Could you please drop that single patch? Thanks, -- Best regards, Michał Kępień
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-02-17 04:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net> - 2017-02-17 04:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-02-17 05:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net> - 2017-02-17 05:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-02-17 06:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-24 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> - 2017-02-26 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-26 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> - 2017-02-17 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-02-24 23:20 +0100
csiph-web