Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #162621

Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too?

From Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows
Subject Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too?
Date 2022-08-16 18:57 +0000
Organization NOYB
Message-ID <tdh0ao.2as.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <tdb5dm$11ms$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tdb7fi$1u1f$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tdb9os$37ahq$1@dont-email.me> <tddufb.kmg.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <tddul5$3na9d$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
> On 8/15/2022 11:07 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> > Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> >> Getting past the MSA is largely an install time thing.
> >> After that, nobody gives a fuck.
> > 
> >    Well, actually *Microsoft* gives a fuck, because after a recent
> > Windows 11 update, I *again* got an install-like UI (which enticed you
> > to subscribe to all kinds of services, which I of course declined) which
> > required an MSA to continue. The (full-screen) UI could not be exited
> > and I did not want to force a shutdown. In the end I chose a
> > 'Back'function and *there* it presented the option to continue with a
> > local account.
> > 
> >    Bottom line: Again more of the familiar Microsoft tricks to say/imply
> > that an MSA is mandatory and again hidden tricks to evade that
> > requirement.
> > 
> >    FWIW, new (July 27) laptop with Windows 11 Home. 'winver' says:
> > 
> > Version 21H2 (OS Build 22000.856)
> > 
> > (Let me know if you need more version info (and how to get it) for your
> > Secret Decoder Ring.)
> 
> control-alt-delete  then TaskManager
> 
> Run menu : "cmd" to run a command prompt window
> 
>     tasklist /svc
> 
> Survey the scene and pick the most likely culprit.
> It may be easier to read the cmd window than watch the
> process list in Task manager.

  Yeah, I probably should have done something like that in order to try
to catch and identify the culprit, but the install-like UI caught me by
surprise [1] and I thought that they were doing an install all over
again, causing me to lose all my copying-of-files/(re)installing-of-
software/(re-)configuring-of-software/etc. that I had been doing the
last few weeks, so my priority was getting out and saving my stuff, not
trying to catch the culprit.

[1] Imagine innocent Joe User who is put into this mess by Microsoft,
when he just wants to get on with his - rudely interrupted - work!

> The "extra services" dialog appears on other machines like
> that too, but there is a button "try again in three days time"
> or the like, so you can be annoyed by it then.

  For the install-like UI I got (your term SCOOBE: Second chance out of
box experience), there was no "try again in three days time" button.

> And you *can* turn the machine power off. The journal
> on C: is amazing :-)

  Yeah, I'm not worried about the journal, I'm worried about
Microsoft knowing 'better' and wiping stuff, doing an install, etc..
After all, this is Windows 11, not Real Windows (TM)! :-(

> *******
> 
> Alternately, shift-F10 is mentioned as a way to open a Command Prompt.
> 
> https://www.ghacks.net/2022/05/13/how-to-bypass-the-microsoft-account-requirement-during-windows-setup/

  Yeah, that one is in my notes as well. Small problem is that I can't
get to those notes when this happened/happens. Catch-22! So next time,
I'll have to borrow SWMBO's machine to get to (the backup of) my notes!

[...]

[Likely culprit covered in your other response.]

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2022-08-13 08:27 -0700
  Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? cris <cris@removespam.me.com> - 2022-08-13 13:04 -0230
    Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-13 11:46 -0400
      Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-13 19:47 +0100
        Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-13 15:08 -0400
          Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-13 22:25 +0100
            Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-13 18:07 -0400
              Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 04:32 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 06:41 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 14:50 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 10:25 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 16:08 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:45 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Sail Fisherman <sailfisherman@sailfisherman.com> - 2022-08-15 02:07 +0900
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:05 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman@yahoo.com> - 2022-08-14 10:30 -0600
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:39 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? "Rick" <rick@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 10:26 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 11:04 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 16:28 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> - 2022-08-14 17:31 +0200
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:05 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 11:47 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 17:22 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 13:01 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 18:26 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? CDB <bellemarecd@gmail.com> - 2022-08-14 13:31 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Arlen Holder <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 22:15 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2022-08-15 15:07 +0000
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-15 13:09 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-15 17:14 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2022-08-16 18:59 +0000
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2022-08-16 18:57 +0000
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? YK <youkidding@yahoo.com> - 2022-08-15 11:14 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-15 13:18 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-15 13:34 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? YK <youkidding@yahoo.com> - 2022-08-16 17:04 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 16:19 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Arlen Holder <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 22:16 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? "Rick" <rick@nospam.com> - 2022-08-17 11:41 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:05 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 17:49 +0100
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> - 2022-08-14 10:31 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:05 -0400
                Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2022-08-14 11:09 -0600

csiph-web