Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?

From	Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?
Date	2017-06-05 11:50 +0200
Message-ID	<tOWO5-1cd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tNtXQ-fI-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNQUq-7vd-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tOaq5-3mk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tOhUB-81i-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/03/17 15:59, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 08:08 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> What would you suggest?
> 
> I would suggest not using linux-libc-dev from jessie-backports.
> 

This workaround is already known; see my first post in this
thread.

Regards
Harri

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

<linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-06-01 10:50 +0200
  Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-06-02 11:20 +0200
    Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-06-03 08:10 +0200
      Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-06-03 16:10 +0200
        Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-06-05 11:50 +0200

csiph-web