Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #57881
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports? |
| Date | 2017-06-03 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tOhUB-81i-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tNtXQ-fI-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNQUq-7vd-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tOaq5-3mk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 08:08 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > On 06/02/17 11:16, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 10:37 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > > > > Workaround is to avoid the backports package, but I wonder if it > > > would > > > be possible to fix this? How comes that the fix for #822396 > > > doesn't > > > work for Jessie? > > > > I think it depends on changes to the glibc headers. > > > > <rhetorical> > Shouldn't debian/control mention this dependency? > </rhetorical> > > Of course I understand that there is no backport of glibc. AFAICS > the conflict in Jessie has been introduced by the backports kernel, > ignoring old glibc. This is even more painful, since 4.9.x is > supposed to be a LTS kernel. > > IMU <linux/if.h> should either look at the glibc version number, > or avoid the double definitions using "#ifndef". > > What would you suggest? I would suggest not using linux-libc-dev from jessie-backports. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed. - Carolyn Scheppner
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
<linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-06-01 10:50 +0200
Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-06-02 11:20 +0200
Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-06-03 08:10 +0200
Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-06-03 16:10 +0200
Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-06-05 11:50 +0200
csiph-web