Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #57881

Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?

From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?
Date 2017-06-03 16:10 +0200
Message-ID <tOhUB-81i-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tNtXQ-fI-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNQUq-7vd-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tOaq5-3mk-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 08:08 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 06/02/17 11:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 10:37 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > 
> > > Workaround is to avoid the backports package, but I wonder if it
> > > would
> > > be possible to fix this? How comes that the fix for #822396
> > > doesn't
> > > work for Jessie?
> > 
> > I think it depends on changes to the glibc headers.
> > 
> 
> <rhetorical>
> Shouldn't debian/control mention this dependency?
> </rhetorical>
>
> Of course I understand that there is no backport of glibc. AFAICS
> the conflict in Jessie has been introduced by the backports kernel,
> ignoring old glibc. This is even more painful, since 4.9.x is
> supposed to be a LTS kernel.
> 
> IMU <linux/if.h> should either look at the glibc version number,
> or avoid the double definitions using "#ifndef".
> 
> What would you suggest?

I would suggest not using linux-libc-dev from jessie-backports.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment
destroyed.
                                                    - Carolyn Scheppner

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

<linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-06-01 10:50 +0200
  Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-06-02 11:20 +0200
    Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-06-03 08:10 +0200
      Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-06-03 16:10 +0200
        Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for  backports? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-06-05 11:50 +0200

csiph-web