Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1566724
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate |
| Date | 2017-01-25 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3ysG-403-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t3xGh-3sb-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote: > The pinctrl-baytrail driver builds just fine as a module so give > users this option. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Looks okay to me. FWIW: Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > --- > This was discussed almost one year ago, with no clear conclusion, but > also no evidence that the driver can't be built as a module. Is there > any way to push this forward? > > drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- linux-4.7-rc7.orig/drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig 2016-07-12 14:35:36.024835842 +0200 > +++ linux-4.7-rc7/drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig 2016-07-12 14:35:44.735904433 +0200 > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > # > > config PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL > - bool "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control" > + tristate "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control" > depends on GPIOLIB && ACPI > select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP > select PINMUX > > > -- > Jean Delvare > SUSE L3 Support -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-25 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-25 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-26 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-27 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-01-26 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2017-01-26 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:40 +0100
csiph-web