Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate

From	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate
Date	2017-01-26 10:30 +0100
Message-ID	<t3Oxs-5zz-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<t3xGh-3sb-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3ysG-403-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3Oe6-5t5-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:05:06AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Mika and all,
> 
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:16:51 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:26:08PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > The pinctrl-baytrail driver builds just fine as a module so give
> > > users this option.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Assuming you have checked that nothing breaks in Baytrail, I'm fine with
> > this change,
> 
> I have not, as I do not have access to any Baytrail hardware. This is
> the very reason why I'd like this code to be buildable as a module: I'm
> not happy with a useless 50 kB driver being loaded on all my systems. I
> was hopping someone at Intel would have access to the hardware to
> perform the test.

We do not have all the possible hardware here. I have one Minnowboard
MAX which I can test this on (like I commented in the other email) but
it does not have any ACPI GPIO OpRegion stuff that is present in many
Baytrail based laptops out there.

Thread

[PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-25 16:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-25 17:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to  tristate Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-26 10:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to  tristate Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-27 10:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 17:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 09:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-01-26 10:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2017-01-26 10:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:40 +0100

csiph-web